TY - JOUR
T1 - Contamination issues in a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility
AU - Khullar, Esha
AU - Kent, Angela D.
AU - Leathers, Timothy D.
AU - Bischoff, Kenneth M.
AU - Rausch, Kent D.
AU - Tumbleson, M. E.
AU - Singh, Vijay
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Low ethanol yields and poor yeast viability were investigated at a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility. Using starch slurries and recycle streams from a commercial ethanol facility, laboratory hydrolysates were prepared by reproducing starch liquefaction and saccharification steps in the laboratory. Fermentations with hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory were compared with plant hydrolysates for final ethanol concentrations and total yeast counts. Fermentation controls were prepared using hydrolysates (plant and laboratory) that were not inoculated with yeast. Hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory resulted in higher final ethanol concentrations (15. 8 % v/v) than plant hydrolysate (13. 4 % v/v). Uninoculated controls resulted in ethanol production from both laboratory (12. 2 % v/v) and plant hydrolysates (13. 7 % v/v), indicating the presence of a contaminating microorganism. Yeast colony counts on cycloheximide and virginiamycin plates confirmed the presence of a contaminant. DNA sequencing and fingerprinting studies also indicated a number of dissimilar communities in samples obtained from fermentors, coolers, saccharification tanks, and thin stillage.
AB - Low ethanol yields and poor yeast viability were investigated at a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility. Using starch slurries and recycle streams from a commercial ethanol facility, laboratory hydrolysates were prepared by reproducing starch liquefaction and saccharification steps in the laboratory. Fermentations with hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory were compared with plant hydrolysates for final ethanol concentrations and total yeast counts. Fermentation controls were prepared using hydrolysates (plant and laboratory) that were not inoculated with yeast. Hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory resulted in higher final ethanol concentrations (15. 8 % v/v) than plant hydrolysate (13. 4 % v/v). Uninoculated controls resulted in ethanol production from both laboratory (12. 2 % v/v) and plant hydrolysates (13. 7 % v/v), indicating the presence of a contaminating microorganism. Yeast colony counts on cycloheximide and virginiamycin plates confirmed the presence of a contaminant. DNA sequencing and fingerprinting studies also indicated a number of dissimilar communities in samples obtained from fermentors, coolers, saccharification tanks, and thin stillage.
KW - Contamination
KW - Ethanol
KW - Wet milling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875754666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875754666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11274-012-1244-6
DO - 10.1007/s11274-012-1244-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 23266886
AN - SCOPUS:84875754666
SN - 0959-3993
VL - 29
SP - 891
EP - 898
JO - World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
JF - World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
IS - 5
ER -