TY - JOUR
T1 - Construction schedule augmentation with implicit dependency constraints and automated generation of lookahead plan revisions
AU - Amer, Fouad
AU - Jung, Yoonhwa
AU - Golparvar-Fard, Mani
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Revising lookahead plans is practiced in all construction projects to meet contractual deadlines, mitigate activity delays, and disentangle process bottlenecks. We present a new machine learning-based method –which we call Implicit Logic Checker (ILC)– to learn the implicit dependency constraints and the flexibility of construction schedule relationships using a Transformer language model architecture. We then leverage relationships’ flexibilities to provide a basis for creating optimal lookahead plan revisions to help mitigate the effects of unavoidable activity delays. We then deploy a Constrained Conditional (CC) model that applies learned construction planning knowledge to build revised lookahead plans and optimizes them for consistency and duration. Our ILC model is trained and tested on 35,332 manually labeled predecessor-successor relationships from eight real construction projects achieving an F1-Score of 91%. Similarly, the revised lookahead plans generated by the CC model on two case studies show reduced overall plan durations.
AB - Revising lookahead plans is practiced in all construction projects to meet contractual deadlines, mitigate activity delays, and disentangle process bottlenecks. We present a new machine learning-based method –which we call Implicit Logic Checker (ILC)– to learn the implicit dependency constraints and the flexibility of construction schedule relationships using a Transformer language model architecture. We then leverage relationships’ flexibilities to provide a basis for creating optimal lookahead plan revisions to help mitigate the effects of unavoidable activity delays. We then deploy a Constrained Conditional (CC) model that applies learned construction planning knowledge to build revised lookahead plans and optimizes them for consistency and duration. Our ILC model is trained and tested on 35,332 manually labeled predecessor-successor relationships from eight real construction projects achieving an F1-Score of 91%. Similarly, the revised lookahead plans generated by the CC model on two case studies show reduced overall plan durations.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Construction planning
KW - Machine learning
KW - Natural language processing
KW - Project controls
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159852529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159852529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104896
DO - 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104896
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159852529
SN - 0926-5805
VL - 152
JO - Automation in Construction
JF - Automation in Construction
M1 - 104896
ER -