Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication

Daniel J. Simons; Yuichi Shoda; D. Stephen Lindsay

doi:10.1017/S0140525X18000845

Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication

Daniel J. Simons, Yuichi Shoda, D. Stephen Lindsay

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Whether or not a replication attempt counts as "direct" often cannot be determined definitively after the fact as a result of flexibility in how procedural differences are interpreted. Specifying constraints on generality in original articles can eliminate ambiguity in advance, thereby leading to a more cumulative science.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e148
Journal	The Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume	41
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000845
State	Published - Jan 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Online availability

10.1017/S0140525X18000845

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

@article{e4e55a4103fc4420b0f67fb5bb5e1ea8,

title = "Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication",

abstract = "Whether or not a replication attempt counts as {"}direct{"} often cannot be determined definitively after the fact as a result of flexibility in how procedural differences are interpreted. Specifying constraints on generality in original articles can eliminate ambiguity in advance, thereby leading to a more cumulative science.",

author = "Simons, \{Daniel J.\} and Yuichi Shoda and Lindsay, \{D. Stephen\}",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X18000845",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "e148",

journal = "The Behavioral and brain sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication

AU - Simons, Daniel J.

AU - Shoda, Yuichi

AU - Lindsay, D. Stephen

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Whether or not a replication attempt counts as "direct" often cannot be determined definitively after the fact as a result of flexibility in how procedural differences are interpreted. Specifying constraints on generality in original articles can eliminate ambiguity in advance, thereby leading to a more cumulative science.

AB - Whether or not a replication attempt counts as "direct" often cannot be determined definitively after the fact as a result of flexibility in how procedural differences are interpreted. Specifying constraints on generality in original articles can eliminate ambiguity in advance, thereby leading to a more cumulative science.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85065796456

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065796456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X18000845

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X18000845

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 31064609

AN - SCOPUS:85065796456

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 41

SP - e148

JO - The Behavioral and brain sciences

JF - The Behavioral and brain sciences

ER -

Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this