Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

New innovations in agricultural biotechnology have radically altered traditional farming, including some long-held practices among farmers such as saving the seed from one crop for planting the next season. Now that farmers buy licensed seed technology from seed breeders, saving seed constitutes infringement. Utility patents, Plant Variety Protection Certificates (PVPCs), and licensing and other contractual arrangements between farmers and intellectual property (IP) owners all serve to protect seed breeders' discoveries from competitors while encouraging continued innovation. Contracts placing specific restrictions on farmers' ability to save seed have engendered significant controversy. Some state legislators have proposed statutory schemes designed to push back the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the seed developer and re-establish farmers' ability to save seed. This chapter looks at the history of intellectual property protection (IPP) for plants and the current contractual measures between seed companies and farmers. It further examines current legislative measures to protect seed-saving practices, and finally looks forward to constitutional questions raised by seed-saving statutes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSeeds of Change
Subtitle of host publicationAgricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century
PublisherCABI Publishing
Pages55-70
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9781845932015
StatePublished - Jun 14 2007

Fingerprint

seed collecting
Seed
Seeds
farmers
seeds
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property
plant variety protection
seed industry
intellectual property rights
agricultural biotechnology
traditional farming
patents
plant protection
Innovation
planting
Patents
Ownership
history
Licensure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • veterinary(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Endres, A. B. (2007). Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes. In Seeds of Change: Agricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century (pp. 55-70). CABI Publishing.

Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes. / Endres, A. B.

Seeds of Change: Agricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century. CABI Publishing, 2007. p. 55-70.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Endres, AB 2007, Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes. in Seeds of Change: Agricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century. CABI Publishing, pp. 55-70.
Endres AB. Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes. In Seeds of Change: Agricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century. CABI Publishing. 2007. p. 55-70
Endres, A. B. / Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes. Seeds of Change: Agricultural Biotechnology in the 21st Century. CABI Publishing, 2007. pp. 55-70
@inbook{8e97ddda50ce4ec1a114405f0fbf345b,
title = "Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes",
abstract = "New innovations in agricultural biotechnology have radically altered traditional farming, including some long-held practices among farmers such as saving the seed from one crop for planting the next season. Now that farmers buy licensed seed technology from seed breeders, saving seed constitutes infringement. Utility patents, Plant Variety Protection Certificates (PVPCs), and licensing and other contractual arrangements between farmers and intellectual property (IP) owners all serve to protect seed breeders' discoveries from competitors while encouraging continued innovation. Contracts placing specific restrictions on farmers' ability to save seed have engendered significant controversy. Some state legislators have proposed statutory schemes designed to push back the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the seed developer and re-establish farmers' ability to save seed. This chapter looks at the history of intellectual property protection (IPP) for plants and the current contractual measures between seed companies and farmers. It further examines current legislative measures to protect seed-saving practices, and finally looks forward to constitutional questions raised by seed-saving statutes.",
author = "Endres, {A. B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "14",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781845932015",
pages = "55--70",
booktitle = "Seeds of Change",
publisher = "CABI Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Constitutional implications of state seed-saving statutes

AU - Endres, A. B.

PY - 2007/6/14

Y1 - 2007/6/14

N2 - New innovations in agricultural biotechnology have radically altered traditional farming, including some long-held practices among farmers such as saving the seed from one crop for planting the next season. Now that farmers buy licensed seed technology from seed breeders, saving seed constitutes infringement. Utility patents, Plant Variety Protection Certificates (PVPCs), and licensing and other contractual arrangements between farmers and intellectual property (IP) owners all serve to protect seed breeders' discoveries from competitors while encouraging continued innovation. Contracts placing specific restrictions on farmers' ability to save seed have engendered significant controversy. Some state legislators have proposed statutory schemes designed to push back the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the seed developer and re-establish farmers' ability to save seed. This chapter looks at the history of intellectual property protection (IPP) for plants and the current contractual measures between seed companies and farmers. It further examines current legislative measures to protect seed-saving practices, and finally looks forward to constitutional questions raised by seed-saving statutes.

AB - New innovations in agricultural biotechnology have radically altered traditional farming, including some long-held practices among farmers such as saving the seed from one crop for planting the next season. Now that farmers buy licensed seed technology from seed breeders, saving seed constitutes infringement. Utility patents, Plant Variety Protection Certificates (PVPCs), and licensing and other contractual arrangements between farmers and intellectual property (IP) owners all serve to protect seed breeders' discoveries from competitors while encouraging continued innovation. Contracts placing specific restrictions on farmers' ability to save seed have engendered significant controversy. Some state legislators have proposed statutory schemes designed to push back the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the seed developer and re-establish farmers' ability to save seed. This chapter looks at the history of intellectual property protection (IPP) for plants and the current contractual measures between seed companies and farmers. It further examines current legislative measures to protect seed-saving practices, and finally looks forward to constitutional questions raised by seed-saving statutes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890131567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890131567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84890131567

SN - 9781845932015

SP - 55

EP - 70

BT - Seeds of Change

PB - CABI Publishing

ER -