Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited

Chia Yi Chiu, Hans Friedrich Koehn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Asymptotic Classification Theory of Cognitive Diagnosis (ACTCD) developed by Chiu, Douglas, and Li proved that for educational test data conforming to the Deterministic Input Noisy Output “AND” gate (DINA) model, the probability that hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis (HACA) assigns examinees to their true proficiency classes approaches 1 as the number of test items increases. This article proves that the ACTCD also covers test data conforming to the Deterministic Input Noisy Output “OR” gate (DINO) model. It also demonstrates that an extension to the statistical framework of the ACTCD, originally developed for test data conforming to the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model or the General Diagnostic Model (a) is valid also for both the DINA model and the DINO model and (b) substantially increases the accuracy of HACA in classifying examinees when the test data conform to either of these two models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-479
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Psychological Measurement
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 8 2015

Keywords

  • DINA model
  • DINO model
  • classification
  • cluster analysis
  • cognitive diagnosis
  • consistency
  • heuristics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this