Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition

Krystle Zuniga, E. McAuley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Older adults are the most rapidly growing age group in the United States, and it is estimated that 22.2% of U.S. adults over 71 years of age have cognitive impairments without dementia and 13.9% have dementia. Cognitive impairment is associated with reduced quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, inability to live independently, and increased health care costs; therefore, identification of modifiable risk factors for prevention and delay of cognitive decline is of increasing importance. There is a growing body of research and interest in the relationship between diet and cognitive function. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cognitive function may be improved and cognitive decline prevented as a function of a particular nutrient, food group or dietary pattern; however, results from these trials have failed to be replicated in randomized controlled trials. One possible reason for the equivocality of findings in the diet and cognitive function literature may be the methodological issues and limitations in the assessment of dietary patterns and nutritional intake. Self-reported dietary data can be biased by many factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and education; yet, there is limited research on the impact of cognitive function on the integrity of self-reported dietary data. Cognitive function itself may bias diet assessment methods, subsequently obscuring the evaluation of the nutrition-cognition relationship. The present review summarizes methodological validation studies that provide insight into potential errors of diet assessment methods due to cognitive function, identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for improving diet assessment accuracy in studies of individuals with cognitive impairments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-340
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Nutrition, Health and Aging
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 11 2015

Fingerprint

Cognition
Diet
Dementia
Research
Food
Validation Studies
Social Class
Health Care Costs
Epidemiologic Studies
Hospitalization
Randomized Controlled Trials
Age Groups
Quality of Life
Cognitive Dysfunction
Education

Keywords

  • Diet assessment
  • cognition
  • nutrition/diet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition. / Zuniga, Krystle; McAuley, E.

In: Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, Vol. 19, No. 3, 11.03.2015, p. 333-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8067503ef8374d4285163ee95d5ad041,
title = "Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition",
abstract = "Older adults are the most rapidly growing age group in the United States, and it is estimated that 22.2{\%} of U.S. adults over 71 years of age have cognitive impairments without dementia and 13.9{\%} have dementia. Cognitive impairment is associated with reduced quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, inability to live independently, and increased health care costs; therefore, identification of modifiable risk factors for prevention and delay of cognitive decline is of increasing importance. There is a growing body of research and interest in the relationship between diet and cognitive function. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cognitive function may be improved and cognitive decline prevented as a function of a particular nutrient, food group or dietary pattern; however, results from these trials have failed to be replicated in randomized controlled trials. One possible reason for the equivocality of findings in the diet and cognitive function literature may be the methodological issues and limitations in the assessment of dietary patterns and nutritional intake. Self-reported dietary data can be biased by many factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and education; yet, there is limited research on the impact of cognitive function on the integrity of self-reported dietary data. Cognitive function itself may bias diet assessment methods, subsequently obscuring the evaluation of the nutrition-cognition relationship. The present review summarizes methodological validation studies that provide insight into potential errors of diet assessment methods due to cognitive function, identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for improving diet assessment accuracy in studies of individuals with cognitive impairments.",
keywords = "Diet assessment, cognition, nutrition/diet",
author = "Krystle Zuniga and E. McAuley",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s12603-014-0566-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "333--340",
journal = "Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging",
issn = "1279-7707",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition

AU - Zuniga, Krystle

AU - McAuley, E.

PY - 2015/3/11

Y1 - 2015/3/11

N2 - Older adults are the most rapidly growing age group in the United States, and it is estimated that 22.2% of U.S. adults over 71 years of age have cognitive impairments without dementia and 13.9% have dementia. Cognitive impairment is associated with reduced quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, inability to live independently, and increased health care costs; therefore, identification of modifiable risk factors for prevention and delay of cognitive decline is of increasing importance. There is a growing body of research and interest in the relationship between diet and cognitive function. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cognitive function may be improved and cognitive decline prevented as a function of a particular nutrient, food group or dietary pattern; however, results from these trials have failed to be replicated in randomized controlled trials. One possible reason for the equivocality of findings in the diet and cognitive function literature may be the methodological issues and limitations in the assessment of dietary patterns and nutritional intake. Self-reported dietary data can be biased by many factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and education; yet, there is limited research on the impact of cognitive function on the integrity of self-reported dietary data. Cognitive function itself may bias diet assessment methods, subsequently obscuring the evaluation of the nutrition-cognition relationship. The present review summarizes methodological validation studies that provide insight into potential errors of diet assessment methods due to cognitive function, identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for improving diet assessment accuracy in studies of individuals with cognitive impairments.

AB - Older adults are the most rapidly growing age group in the United States, and it is estimated that 22.2% of U.S. adults over 71 years of age have cognitive impairments without dementia and 13.9% have dementia. Cognitive impairment is associated with reduced quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, inability to live independently, and increased health care costs; therefore, identification of modifiable risk factors for prevention and delay of cognitive decline is of increasing importance. There is a growing body of research and interest in the relationship between diet and cognitive function. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cognitive function may be improved and cognitive decline prevented as a function of a particular nutrient, food group or dietary pattern; however, results from these trials have failed to be replicated in randomized controlled trials. One possible reason for the equivocality of findings in the diet and cognitive function literature may be the methodological issues and limitations in the assessment of dietary patterns and nutritional intake. Self-reported dietary data can be biased by many factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and education; yet, there is limited research on the impact of cognitive function on the integrity of self-reported dietary data. Cognitive function itself may bias diet assessment methods, subsequently obscuring the evaluation of the nutrition-cognition relationship. The present review summarizes methodological validation studies that provide insight into potential errors of diet assessment methods due to cognitive function, identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for improving diet assessment accuracy in studies of individuals with cognitive impairments.

KW - Diet assessment

KW - cognition

KW - nutrition/diet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925519696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925519696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12603-014-0566-5

DO - 10.1007/s12603-014-0566-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 25732219

AN - SCOPUS:84925519696

VL - 19

SP - 333

EP - 340

JO - Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging

JF - Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging

SN - 1279-7707

IS - 3

ER -