Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use

Jeanette Whitaker, John L. Field, Carl J. Bernacchi, Carlos E.P. Cerri, Reinhart Ceulemans, Christian A. Davies, Evan H. DeLucia, Iain S. Donnison, Jon P. McCalmont, Keith Paustian, Rebecca L. Rowe, Pete Smith, Patricia Thornley, Niall P. McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Perennial bioenergy crops have significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation by substituting for fossil fuels; yet delivering significant GHG savings will require substantial land-use change, globally. Over the last decade, research has delivered improved understanding of the environmental benefits and risks of this transition to perennial bioenergy crops, addressing concerns that the impacts of land conversion to perennial bioenergy crops could result in increased rather than decreased GHG emissions. For policymakers to assess the most cost-effective and sustainable options for deployment and climate change mitigation, synthesis of these studies is needed to support evidence-based decision making. In 2015, a workshop was convened with researchers, policymakers and industry/business representatives from the UK, EU and internationally. Outcomes from global research on bioenergy land-use change were compared to identify areas of consensus, key uncertainties, and research priorities. Here, we discuss the strength of evidence for and against six consensus statements summarising the effects of land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops on the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and water, in the context of the whole life-cycle of bioenergy production. Our analysis suggests that the direct impacts of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops on soil carbon and nitrous oxide are increasingly well understood and are often consistent with significant life cycle GHG mitigation from bioenergy relative to conventional energy sources. We conclude that the GHG balance of perennial bioenergy crop cultivation will often be favourable, with maximum GHG savings achieved where crops are grown on soils with low carbon stocks and conservative nutrient application, accruing additional environmental benefits such as improved water quality. The analysis reported here demonstrates there is a mature and increasingly comprehensive evidence base on the environmental benefits and risks of bioenergy cultivation which can support the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-164
Number of pages15
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

energy crops
bioenergy
Land use
Crops
Greenhouse gases
uncertainty
land use
greenhouse gases
land use change
crop
ecosystem services
greenhouse gas
pollution control
greenhouse gas emissions
Gas emissions
life cycle (organisms)
Climate change
Carbon
Life cycle
climate change

Keywords

  • biofuels
  • biomass
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • land-use change
  • life-cycle assessment
  • nitrous oxide
  • perennial bioenergy crops
  • soil carbon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Whitaker, J., Field, J. L., Bernacchi, C. J., Cerri, C. E. P., Ceulemans, R., Davies, C. A., ... McNamara, N. P. (2018). Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use. GCB Bioenergy, 10(3), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12488

Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use. / Whitaker, Jeanette; Field, John L.; Bernacchi, Carl J.; Cerri, Carlos E.P.; Ceulemans, Reinhart; Davies, Christian A.; DeLucia, Evan H.; Donnison, Iain S.; McCalmont, Jon P.; Paustian, Keith; Rowe, Rebecca L.; Smith, Pete; Thornley, Patricia; McNamara, Niall P.

In: GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 03.2018, p. 150-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Whitaker, J, Field, JL, Bernacchi, CJ, Cerri, CEP, Ceulemans, R, Davies, CA, DeLucia, EH, Donnison, IS, McCalmont, JP, Paustian, K, Rowe, RL, Smith, P, Thornley, P & McNamara, NP 2018, 'Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use', GCB Bioenergy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12488
Whitaker, Jeanette ; Field, John L. ; Bernacchi, Carl J. ; Cerri, Carlos E.P. ; Ceulemans, Reinhart ; Davies, Christian A. ; DeLucia, Evan H. ; Donnison, Iain S. ; McCalmont, Jon P. ; Paustian, Keith ; Rowe, Rebecca L. ; Smith, Pete ; Thornley, Patricia ; McNamara, Niall P. / Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use. In: GCB Bioenergy. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 150-164.
@article{cba35393eb4e4ed7a55ac23e4fa04ee2,
title = "Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use",
abstract = "Perennial bioenergy crops have significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation by substituting for fossil fuels; yet delivering significant GHG savings will require substantial land-use change, globally. Over the last decade, research has delivered improved understanding of the environmental benefits and risks of this transition to perennial bioenergy crops, addressing concerns that the impacts of land conversion to perennial bioenergy crops could result in increased rather than decreased GHG emissions. For policymakers to assess the most cost-effective and sustainable options for deployment and climate change mitigation, synthesis of these studies is needed to support evidence-based decision making. In 2015, a workshop was convened with researchers, policymakers and industry/business representatives from the UK, EU and internationally. Outcomes from global research on bioenergy land-use change were compared to identify areas of consensus, key uncertainties, and research priorities. Here, we discuss the strength of evidence for and against six consensus statements summarising the effects of land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops on the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and water, in the context of the whole life-cycle of bioenergy production. Our analysis suggests that the direct impacts of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops on soil carbon and nitrous oxide are increasingly well understood and are often consistent with significant life cycle GHG mitigation from bioenergy relative to conventional energy sources. We conclude that the GHG balance of perennial bioenergy crop cultivation will often be favourable, with maximum GHG savings achieved where crops are grown on soils with low carbon stocks and conservative nutrient application, accruing additional environmental benefits such as improved water quality. The analysis reported here demonstrates there is a mature and increasingly comprehensive evidence base on the environmental benefits and risks of bioenergy cultivation which can support the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry.",
keywords = "biofuels, biomass, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use change, life-cycle assessment, nitrous oxide, perennial bioenergy crops, soil carbon",
author = "Jeanette Whitaker and Field, {John L.} and Bernacchi, {Carl J.} and Cerri, {Carlos E.P.} and Reinhart Ceulemans and Davies, {Christian A.} and DeLucia, {Evan H.} and Donnison, {Iain S.} and McCalmont, {Jon P.} and Keith Paustian and Rowe, {Rebecca L.} and Pete Smith and Patricia Thornley and McNamara, {Niall P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12488",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "150--164",
journal = "GCB Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use

AU - Whitaker, Jeanette

AU - Field, John L.

AU - Bernacchi, Carl J.

AU - Cerri, Carlos E.P.

AU - Ceulemans, Reinhart

AU - Davies, Christian A.

AU - DeLucia, Evan H.

AU - Donnison, Iain S.

AU - McCalmont, Jon P.

AU - Paustian, Keith

AU - Rowe, Rebecca L.

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Thornley, Patricia

AU - McNamara, Niall P.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Perennial bioenergy crops have significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation by substituting for fossil fuels; yet delivering significant GHG savings will require substantial land-use change, globally. Over the last decade, research has delivered improved understanding of the environmental benefits and risks of this transition to perennial bioenergy crops, addressing concerns that the impacts of land conversion to perennial bioenergy crops could result in increased rather than decreased GHG emissions. For policymakers to assess the most cost-effective and sustainable options for deployment and climate change mitigation, synthesis of these studies is needed to support evidence-based decision making. In 2015, a workshop was convened with researchers, policymakers and industry/business representatives from the UK, EU and internationally. Outcomes from global research on bioenergy land-use change were compared to identify areas of consensus, key uncertainties, and research priorities. Here, we discuss the strength of evidence for and against six consensus statements summarising the effects of land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops on the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and water, in the context of the whole life-cycle of bioenergy production. Our analysis suggests that the direct impacts of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops on soil carbon and nitrous oxide are increasingly well understood and are often consistent with significant life cycle GHG mitigation from bioenergy relative to conventional energy sources. We conclude that the GHG balance of perennial bioenergy crop cultivation will often be favourable, with maximum GHG savings achieved where crops are grown on soils with low carbon stocks and conservative nutrient application, accruing additional environmental benefits such as improved water quality. The analysis reported here demonstrates there is a mature and increasingly comprehensive evidence base on the environmental benefits and risks of bioenergy cultivation which can support the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry.

AB - Perennial bioenergy crops have significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation by substituting for fossil fuels; yet delivering significant GHG savings will require substantial land-use change, globally. Over the last decade, research has delivered improved understanding of the environmental benefits and risks of this transition to perennial bioenergy crops, addressing concerns that the impacts of land conversion to perennial bioenergy crops could result in increased rather than decreased GHG emissions. For policymakers to assess the most cost-effective and sustainable options for deployment and climate change mitigation, synthesis of these studies is needed to support evidence-based decision making. In 2015, a workshop was convened with researchers, policymakers and industry/business representatives from the UK, EU and internationally. Outcomes from global research on bioenergy land-use change were compared to identify areas of consensus, key uncertainties, and research priorities. Here, we discuss the strength of evidence for and against six consensus statements summarising the effects of land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops on the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and water, in the context of the whole life-cycle of bioenergy production. Our analysis suggests that the direct impacts of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops on soil carbon and nitrous oxide are increasingly well understood and are often consistent with significant life cycle GHG mitigation from bioenergy relative to conventional energy sources. We conclude that the GHG balance of perennial bioenergy crop cultivation will often be favourable, with maximum GHG savings achieved where crops are grown on soils with low carbon stocks and conservative nutrient application, accruing additional environmental benefits such as improved water quality. The analysis reported here demonstrates there is a mature and increasingly comprehensive evidence base on the environmental benefits and risks of bioenergy cultivation which can support the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry.

KW - biofuels

KW - biomass

KW - greenhouse gas emissions

KW - land-use change

KW - life-cycle assessment

KW - nitrous oxide

KW - perennial bioenergy crops

KW - soil carbon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035233278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035233278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12488

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12488

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85035233278

VL - 10

SP - 150

EP - 164

JO - GCB Bioenergy

JF - GCB Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 3

ER -