Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line

Tracy E Sulkin, Cortney M. Moriarty, Veronica Hefner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We explore differences in House candidates' campaign agendas across Web sites and televised ads, comparing the size and scope of their online and off-line issue priorities, their patterns of partisan issue ownership and issue trespassing, and the extent of issue convergence with the agendas of their opponents. Our results, based on a sample of 129 candidates in the 2000 election, indicate that Web and ad agendas are similar in a number of ways but that differences do exist across the venues. These differences have important theoretical implications for our understanding of candidate behavior and campaign effects as well as important practical implications for political communication researchers choosing venues for study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-79
Number of pages17
JournalHarvard International Journal of Press/Politics
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

Fingerprint

Websites
candidacy
Communication
campaign
political communication
election

Keywords

  • Advertisements
  • Congressional campaigns
  • Issue agendas
  • Web sites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line. / Sulkin, Tracy E; Moriarty, Cortney M.; Hefner, Veronica.

In: Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.04.2007, p. 63-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sulkin, Tracy E ; Moriarty, Cortney M. ; Hefner, Veronica. / Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line. In: Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 63-79.
@article{264e49a2e56e4513b6d04cff02e40c71,
title = "Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line",
abstract = "We explore differences in House candidates' campaign agendas across Web sites and televised ads, comparing the size and scope of their online and off-line issue priorities, their patterns of partisan issue ownership and issue trespassing, and the extent of issue convergence with the agendas of their opponents. Our results, based on a sample of 129 candidates in the 2000 election, indicate that Web and ad agendas are similar in a number of ways but that differences do exist across the venues. These differences have important theoretical implications for our understanding of candidate behavior and campaign effects as well as important practical implications for political communication researchers choosing venues for study.",
keywords = "Advertisements, Congressional campaigns, Issue agendas, Web sites",
author = "Sulkin, {Tracy E} and Moriarty, {Cortney M.} and Veronica Hefner",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1081180X07299802",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "63--79",
journal = "International Journal of Press/Politics",
issn = "1940-1612",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line

AU - Sulkin, Tracy E

AU - Moriarty, Cortney M.

AU - Hefner, Veronica

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - We explore differences in House candidates' campaign agendas across Web sites and televised ads, comparing the size and scope of their online and off-line issue priorities, their patterns of partisan issue ownership and issue trespassing, and the extent of issue convergence with the agendas of their opponents. Our results, based on a sample of 129 candidates in the 2000 election, indicate that Web and ad agendas are similar in a number of ways but that differences do exist across the venues. These differences have important theoretical implications for our understanding of candidate behavior and campaign effects as well as important practical implications for political communication researchers choosing venues for study.

AB - We explore differences in House candidates' campaign agendas across Web sites and televised ads, comparing the size and scope of their online and off-line issue priorities, their patterns of partisan issue ownership and issue trespassing, and the extent of issue convergence with the agendas of their opponents. Our results, based on a sample of 129 candidates in the 2000 election, indicate that Web and ad agendas are similar in a number of ways but that differences do exist across the venues. These differences have important theoretical implications for our understanding of candidate behavior and campaign effects as well as important practical implications for political communication researchers choosing venues for study.

KW - Advertisements

KW - Congressional campaigns

KW - Issue agendas

KW - Web sites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147111731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147111731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1081180X07299802

DO - 10.1177/1081180X07299802

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34147111731

VL - 12

SP - 63

EP - 79

JO - International Journal of Press/Politics

JF - International Journal of Press/Politics

SN - 1940-1612

IS - 2

ER -