Abstract
QUESTION: Does the choice of surgical approach (anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior) improve clinical outcomes in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures? RECOMMENDATIONS: In the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or a combined approach as the selection of approach does not appear to impact clinical or neurological outcomes. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B With regard to radiologic outcomes in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may utilize an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient With regard to complications in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | E56-E58 |
Journal | Clinical Neurosurgery |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anterior decompression and fusion
- Combined anterior and posterior approach
- Posterior instrumentation
- Surgical approach
- Surgical treatment
- Thoracolumbar fractures
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Clinical Neurology