Conflict adaptation and cue competition during learning in an Eriksen flanker task

Rodica Ghinescu, Todd R. Schachtman, Ashley K. Ramsey, Gabriele Gratton, Monica Fabiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0167119
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Cues
learning
Learning
Conflict (Psychology)
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Conflict adaptation and cue competition during learning in an Eriksen flanker task. / Ghinescu, Rodica; Schachtman, Todd R.; Ramsey, Ashley K.; Gratton, Gabriele; Fabiani, Monica.

In: PloS one, Vol. 11, No. 12, e0167119, 12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghinescu, Rodica ; Schachtman, Todd R. ; Ramsey, Ashley K. ; Gratton, Gabriele ; Fabiani, Monica. / Conflict adaptation and cue competition during learning in an Eriksen flanker task. In: PloS one. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 12.
@article{31793cb1d4e74746926da21f2c0c9c70,
title = "Conflict adaptation and cue competition during learning in an Eriksen flanker task",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.",
author = "Rodica Ghinescu and Schachtman, {Todd R.} and Ramsey, {Ashley K.} and Gabriele Gratton and Monica Fabiani",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0167119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict adaptation and cue competition during learning in an Eriksen flanker task

AU - Ghinescu, Rodica

AU - Schachtman, Todd R.

AU - Ramsey, Ashley K.

AU - Gratton, Gabriele

AU - Fabiani, Monica

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.

AB - Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005973862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85005973862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0167119

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0167119

M3 - Article

C2 - 27941977

AN - SCOPUS:85005973862

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0167119

ER -