TY - JOUR
T1 - Concurrent verbal reports in second language acquisition research
AU - Bowles, Melissa A.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - This article provides an overview of the ways in which concurrent verbal reports, sometimes referred to as think-alouds, have been used in cognitivist second language acquisition (SLA) research. It addresses two issues related to the validity of verbal reportsreactivity and veridicalityand reviews studies that have examined the validity of verbal reports in SLA. On the basis of the results of a meta-analysis of studies comparing the performance of silent and think-aloud groups (Bowles, 2010), this article concludes with suggestions for further research into the issue of validity and recommendations for the careful use of think-alouds in research.
AB - This article provides an overview of the ways in which concurrent verbal reports, sometimes referred to as think-alouds, have been used in cognitivist second language acquisition (SLA) research. It addresses two issues related to the validity of verbal reportsreactivity and veridicalityand reviews studies that have examined the validity of verbal reports in SLA. On the basis of the results of a meta-analysis of studies comparing the performance of silent and think-aloud groups (Bowles, 2010), this article concludes with suggestions for further research into the issue of validity and recommendations for the careful use of think-alouds in research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952866954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952866954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0267190510000036
DO - 10.1017/S0267190510000036
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:79952866954
SN - 0267-1905
VL - 30
SP - 111
EP - 127
JO - Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
JF - Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
ER -