Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

Brian J. Gaines; Mark Goodwin; Stephen Holden Bates; Gisela Sin

doi:10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

Brian J. Gaines, Mark Goodwin, Stephen Holden Bates, Gisela Sin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	434-441
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Legislative Studies
Volume	25
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613
State	Published - Jul 3 2019

Keywords

Committees
gender
legislatures
rational choice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Political Science and International Relations
Law

Access to Document

10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Gaines, B. J., Goodwin, M., Bates, S. H., & Sin, G. (2019). Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective. Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3), 434-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

@article{bdb1adaadb574b9391cc08074ec26453,

title = "Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective",

abstract = "While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.",

keywords = "Committees, gender, legislatures, rational choice",

author = "Gaines, {Brian J.} and Mark Goodwin and Bates, {Stephen Holden} and Gisela Sin",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "25",

pages = "434--441",

journal = "The Journal of Legislative Studies",

issn = "1357-2334",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conclusion

T2 - prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

AU - Gaines, Brian J.

AU - Goodwin, Mark

AU - Bates, Stephen Holden

AU - Sin, Gisela

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

AB - While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

KW - Committees

KW - gender

KW - legislatures

KW - rational choice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072019705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072019705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

DO - 10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072019705

VL - 25

SP - 434

EP - 441

JO - The Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - The Journal of Legislative Studies

SN - 1357-2334

IS - 3

ER -