TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptualizing resilience within environmental peacebuilding
AU - Johnson, McKenzie F.
AU - Ide, Tobias
AU - Gonzalez Cruz, Jesann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Environmental peacebuilding integrates sustainable natural resource management into peacebuilding processes to promote peace and stability. Environmental peacebuilding scholars increasingly view resilience as an important concept. Yet, the ways in which they understand resilience and its relationship to the environment, conflict, and peacebuilding remain unclear. Much of the research vaguely argues that cooperative natural resource management builds resilience, which has a positive impact on peace amid environmental change. Here, we examine the relationship between resilience and environmental peacebuilding. We review environmental peacebuilding scholarship produced between 2016 and 2022 to assess how scholars 1) employ resilience and 2) conceptualize the mechanisms linking resilience and peace. We argue that scholars need to think critically about the role of resilience in environmental peacebuilding as integrating a nebulous concept such as resilience may serve to muddle rather than clarify natural resource management–peace causal linkages. We offer recommendations on how to better integrate resilience within environmental peacebuilding research and practice.
AB - Environmental peacebuilding integrates sustainable natural resource management into peacebuilding processes to promote peace and stability. Environmental peacebuilding scholars increasingly view resilience as an important concept. Yet, the ways in which they understand resilience and its relationship to the environment, conflict, and peacebuilding remain unclear. Much of the research vaguely argues that cooperative natural resource management builds resilience, which has a positive impact on peace amid environmental change. Here, we examine the relationship between resilience and environmental peacebuilding. We review environmental peacebuilding scholarship produced between 2016 and 2022 to assess how scholars 1) employ resilience and 2) conceptualize the mechanisms linking resilience and peace. We argue that scholars need to think critically about the role of resilience in environmental peacebuilding as integrating a nebulous concept such as resilience may serve to muddle rather than clarify natural resource management–peace causal linkages. We offer recommendations on how to better integrate resilience within environmental peacebuilding research and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170418083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85170418083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101362
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101362
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85170418083
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 65
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
M1 - 101362
ER -