Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: implications for multi-level awareness

Abigail Wooldridge, Pascale Carayon, Peter Hoonakker, Bat Zion Hose, Joshua Ross, Jonathan E. Kohler, Thomas Brazelton, Benjamin Eithun, Michelle M. Kelly, Shannon M. Dean, Deborah Rusy, Ashimiyu Durojaiye, Ayse P. Gurses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Trauma is the leading cause of disability and death in children and young adults in the US. While much is known about the medical aspects of inpatient pediatric trauma care, not much is known about the processes and roles involved in in-hospital care. Using human factors engineering methods, we combine interview, archival document, and trauma registry data to describe how intra-hospital care transitions affect process and team complexity. Specifically, we identify the 53 roles directly involved in patient care in each hospital unit and describe the 3324 total transitions between hospital units and the 69 unique pathways, from arrival to discharge, experienced by pediatric trauma patients. We continue the argument to shift from eliminating complexity to coping with it and propose supporting three levels of awareness to enhance the resilience and adaptation necessary for patient safety in health care, i.e., safety in complex systems. We discuss three levels of awareness (individual, team, and organizational), and describe challenges and potential sociotechnical solutions for each. For example, one challenge to individual awareness is high time pressure. A potential solution is clinical decision support of information perception, integration, and decision-making. A challenge to team awareness is inadequate “non-technical” skills, e.g., leadership, communication, role clarity; simulation or another form of training could improve these. The complex, distributed nature of this process is a challenge to organizational awareness; a potential solution is to develop awareness of the process and the roles and interdependencies within it, using process modeling or simulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-416
Number of pages20
JournalCognition, Technology and Work
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Human engineering
Health care
Large scale systems
Decision making
Trauma
Communication

Keywords

  • Awareness
  • Complexity
  • Fluid teams
  • Patient safety
  • Pediatric trauma care
  • Sociotechnical systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process : implications for multi-level awareness. / Wooldridge, Abigail; Carayon, Pascale; Hoonakker, Peter; Hose, Bat Zion; Ross, Joshua; Kohler, Jonathan E.; Brazelton, Thomas; Eithun, Benjamin; Kelly, Michelle M.; Dean, Shannon M.; Rusy, Deborah; Durojaiye, Ashimiyu; Gurses, Ayse P.

In: Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.08.2019, p. 397-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wooldridge, A, Carayon, P, Hoonakker, P, Hose, BZ, Ross, J, Kohler, JE, Brazelton, T, Eithun, B, Kelly, MM, Dean, SM, Rusy, D, Durojaiye, A & Gurses, AP 2019, 'Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: implications for multi-level awareness', Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0
Wooldridge, Abigail ; Carayon, Pascale ; Hoonakker, Peter ; Hose, Bat Zion ; Ross, Joshua ; Kohler, Jonathan E. ; Brazelton, Thomas ; Eithun, Benjamin ; Kelly, Michelle M. ; Dean, Shannon M. ; Rusy, Deborah ; Durojaiye, Ashimiyu ; Gurses, Ayse P. / Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process : implications for multi-level awareness. In: Cognition, Technology and Work. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 397-416.
@article{38500ef3ca4a4570a8f081d09e4c6656,
title = "Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: implications for multi-level awareness",
abstract = "Trauma is the leading cause of disability and death in children and young adults in the US. While much is known about the medical aspects of inpatient pediatric trauma care, not much is known about the processes and roles involved in in-hospital care. Using human factors engineering methods, we combine interview, archival document, and trauma registry data to describe how intra-hospital care transitions affect process and team complexity. Specifically, we identify the 53 roles directly involved in patient care in each hospital unit and describe the 3324 total transitions between hospital units and the 69 unique pathways, from arrival to discharge, experienced by pediatric trauma patients. We continue the argument to shift from eliminating complexity to coping with it and propose supporting three levels of awareness to enhance the resilience and adaptation necessary for patient safety in health care, i.e., safety in complex systems. We discuss three levels of awareness (individual, team, and organizational), and describe challenges and potential sociotechnical solutions for each. For example, one challenge to individual awareness is high time pressure. A potential solution is clinical decision support of information perception, integration, and decision-making. A challenge to team awareness is inadequate “non-technical” skills, e.g., leadership, communication, role clarity; simulation or another form of training could improve these. The complex, distributed nature of this process is a challenge to organizational awareness; a potential solution is to develop awareness of the process and the roles and interdependencies within it, using process modeling or simulation.",
keywords = "Awareness, Complexity, Fluid teams, Patient safety, Pediatric trauma care, Sociotechnical systems",
author = "Abigail Wooldridge and Pascale Carayon and Peter Hoonakker and Hose, {Bat Zion} and Joshua Ross and Kohler, {Jonathan E.} and Thomas Brazelton and Benjamin Eithun and Kelly, {Michelle M.} and Dean, {Shannon M.} and Deborah Rusy and Ashimiyu Durojaiye and Gurses, {Ayse P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "397--416",
journal = "Cognition, Technology and Work",
issn = "1435-5558",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process

T2 - implications for multi-level awareness

AU - Wooldridge, Abigail

AU - Carayon, Pascale

AU - Hoonakker, Peter

AU - Hose, Bat Zion

AU - Ross, Joshua

AU - Kohler, Jonathan E.

AU - Brazelton, Thomas

AU - Eithun, Benjamin

AU - Kelly, Michelle M.

AU - Dean, Shannon M.

AU - Rusy, Deborah

AU - Durojaiye, Ashimiyu

AU - Gurses, Ayse P.

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Trauma is the leading cause of disability and death in children and young adults in the US. While much is known about the medical aspects of inpatient pediatric trauma care, not much is known about the processes and roles involved in in-hospital care. Using human factors engineering methods, we combine interview, archival document, and trauma registry data to describe how intra-hospital care transitions affect process and team complexity. Specifically, we identify the 53 roles directly involved in patient care in each hospital unit and describe the 3324 total transitions between hospital units and the 69 unique pathways, from arrival to discharge, experienced by pediatric trauma patients. We continue the argument to shift from eliminating complexity to coping with it and propose supporting three levels of awareness to enhance the resilience and adaptation necessary for patient safety in health care, i.e., safety in complex systems. We discuss three levels of awareness (individual, team, and organizational), and describe challenges and potential sociotechnical solutions for each. For example, one challenge to individual awareness is high time pressure. A potential solution is clinical decision support of information perception, integration, and decision-making. A challenge to team awareness is inadequate “non-technical” skills, e.g., leadership, communication, role clarity; simulation or another form of training could improve these. The complex, distributed nature of this process is a challenge to organizational awareness; a potential solution is to develop awareness of the process and the roles and interdependencies within it, using process modeling or simulation.

AB - Trauma is the leading cause of disability and death in children and young adults in the US. While much is known about the medical aspects of inpatient pediatric trauma care, not much is known about the processes and roles involved in in-hospital care. Using human factors engineering methods, we combine interview, archival document, and trauma registry data to describe how intra-hospital care transitions affect process and team complexity. Specifically, we identify the 53 roles directly involved in patient care in each hospital unit and describe the 3324 total transitions between hospital units and the 69 unique pathways, from arrival to discharge, experienced by pediatric trauma patients. We continue the argument to shift from eliminating complexity to coping with it and propose supporting three levels of awareness to enhance the resilience and adaptation necessary for patient safety in health care, i.e., safety in complex systems. We discuss three levels of awareness (individual, team, and organizational), and describe challenges and potential sociotechnical solutions for each. For example, one challenge to individual awareness is high time pressure. A potential solution is clinical decision support of information perception, integration, and decision-making. A challenge to team awareness is inadequate “non-technical” skills, e.g., leadership, communication, role clarity; simulation or another form of training could improve these. The complex, distributed nature of this process is a challenge to organizational awareness; a potential solution is to develop awareness of the process and the roles and interdependencies within it, using process modeling or simulation.

KW - Awareness

KW - Complexity

KW - Fluid teams

KW - Patient safety

KW - Pediatric trauma care

KW - Sociotechnical systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051956487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051956487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0

DO - 10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051956487

VL - 21

SP - 397

EP - 416

JO - Cognition, Technology and Work

JF - Cognition, Technology and Work

SN - 1435-5558

IS - 3

ER -