@article{f908b09f56534ce3b8c31dec4c557834,
title = "Complex life histories predispose aphids to recent abundance declines",
abstract = "Many animals change feeding habits as they progress through life stages, exploiting resources that vary in space and time. However, complex life histories may bring new risks if rapid environmental change disrupts the timing of these switches. Here, we use abundance times series for a diverse group of herbivorous insects, aphids, to search for trait and environmental characteristics associated with declines. Our meta dataset spanned three world regions and >300 aphid species, tracked at 75 individual sites for 10–50 years. Abundances were generally falling, with median changes of −8.3%, −5.6%, and −0.1% per year in the central USA, northwestern USA, and United Kingdom, respectively. Aphids that obligately alternated between host plants annually and those that were agricultural pests exhibited the steepest declines, relative to species able to persist on the same host plant year-round or those in natural areas. This suggests that host alternation might expose aphids to climate-induced phenology mismatches with one or more of their host plant species, with additional risks from exposure to insecticides and other management efforts. Warming temperatures through time were associated with milder aphid declines or even abundance increases, particularly at higher latitudes. Altogether, while a warming world appeared to benefit some aphid species in some places, most aphid species that had time-sensitive movements among multiple host plants seemed to face greater risk of decline. More generally, this suggests that recent human-induced rapid environmental change is rebalancing the risks and rewards associated with complex life histories.",
keywords = "agricultural pest, climate change, host alternation, insect decline, traits",
author = "Crossley, {Michael S.} and Smith, {Olivia M.} and Davis, {Thomas S.} and Eigenbrode, {Sanford D.} and Hartman, {Glen L.} and Doris Lagos-Kutz and Halbert, {Susan E.} and Voegtlin, {David J.} and Moran, {Matthew D.} and Snyder, {William E.}",
note = "Funding Information: This study was supported in part by resources and technical expertise from the Georgia Advanced Computing Resource Center, a partnership between the University of Georgia's Office of the Vice President for Research and Office of the Vice President for Information Technology. We thank the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry for support of this work. We thank James Bell for sharing information about aphid species traits in the UK. We acknowledge funding from USDA‐NIFA‐OREI 2015‐51300‐24155, USDA‐NIFA‐SCRI 2015‐51181‐24292, and USDA‐NIFA‐ORG 2019‐51106‐30188 to W.E.S., USDA‐NIFA 2011‐680020‐30191 and NSF‐DMS 1714195 to S.D.E., and the North Central Soybean Research Program and USDA‐ARS 5012‐22000‐022‐00‐D. Data from the UK suction traps were generously provided by the Rothamsted Insect Survey, a UK National Capability, which is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under the Core Capability Grant BBS/E/C/000J0200. We also thank Science & Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA) for suction‐trap data. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding Information: This study was supported in part by resources and technical expertise from the Georgia Advanced Computing Resource Center, a partnership between the University of Georgia's Office of the Vice President for Research and Office of the Vice President for Information Technology. We thank the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry for support of this work. We thank James Bell for sharing information about aphid species traits in the UK. We acknowledge funding from USDA-NIFA-OREI 2015-51300-24155, USDA-NIFA-SCRI 2015-51181-24292, and USDA-NIFA-ORG 2019-51106-30188 to W.E.S., USDA-NIFA 2011-680020-30191 and NSF-DMS 1714195 to S.D.E., and the North Central Soybean Research Program and USDA-ARS 5012-22000-022-00-D. Data from the UK suction traps were generously provided by the Rothamsted Insect Survey, a UK National Capability, which is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under the Core Capability Grant BBS/E/C/000J0200. We also thank Science & Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA) for suction-trap data. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/gcb.15739",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "4283--4293",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "18",
}