Complementary pricing and land use policies: Does it lead to higher transit use?

Bumsoo Lee, Yongsung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: A shift toward more sustainable transportation requires both adequate pricing of externalities from driving and supportive land use policies. However, proponents of each approach often under-estimate the complementarity and potential synergy between them. This study investigates the interaction effects between gasoline prices and land use (policy) variables using a panel dataset of transit ridership in 67 urbanized areas between 2002 and 2010. We found that while doubling the average gasoline price would increase transit ridership by 8.4% in an urbanized area with mean density and no regional containment policy, in areas with slightly higher density and a regional containment policy, the impact of higher gasoline prices would rise to 21%. In communities that had adopted a package of smart growth land use options, the impact of higher gasoline prices on transit use is even greater.Takeaway for practice: Pricing schemes will be more effective where alternatives to automobility and supportive land use policies exist. The impacts of urban form on travel behavior are also strengthened when driving externalities are correctly priced. Planners and policymakers should take advantage of the complementarity between pricing and land use planning approaches by implementing policies in combined and well-coordinated ways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-328
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the American Planning Association
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2013

Fingerprint

pricing
land use
containment policy
complementarity
containment
travel behavior
synergy
land use planning
policy
planning
interaction
price
community
externality

Keywords

  • complement
  • elasticity
  • land use planning
  • pricing
  • transit ridership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Complementary pricing and land use policies : Does it lead to higher transit use? / Lee, Bumsoo; Lee, Yongsung.

In: Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 79, No. 4, 02.10.2013, p. 314-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{838cec8cf0ca4f009fdc90075faa5ae9,
title = "Complementary pricing and land use policies: Does it lead to higher transit use?",
abstract = "Problem, research strategy, and findings: A shift toward more sustainable transportation requires both adequate pricing of externalities from driving and supportive land use policies. However, proponents of each approach often under-estimate the complementarity and potential synergy between them. This study investigates the interaction effects between gasoline prices and land use (policy) variables using a panel dataset of transit ridership in 67 urbanized areas between 2002 and 2010. We found that while doubling the average gasoline price would increase transit ridership by 8.4{\%} in an urbanized area with mean density and no regional containment policy, in areas with slightly higher density and a regional containment policy, the impact of higher gasoline prices would rise to 21{\%}. In communities that had adopted a package of smart growth land use options, the impact of higher gasoline prices on transit use is even greater.Takeaway for practice: Pricing schemes will be more effective where alternatives to automobility and supportive land use policies exist. The impacts of urban form on travel behavior are also strengthened when driving externalities are correctly priced. Planners and policymakers should take advantage of the complementarity between pricing and land use planning approaches by implementing policies in combined and well-coordinated ways.",
keywords = "complement, elasticity, land use planning, pricing, transit ridership",
author = "Bumsoo Lee and Yongsung Lee",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/01944363.2014.915629",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "314--328",
journal = "Journal of the American Planning Association",
issn = "0194-4363",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary pricing and land use policies

T2 - Does it lead to higher transit use?

AU - Lee, Bumsoo

AU - Lee, Yongsung

PY - 2013/10/2

Y1 - 2013/10/2

N2 - Problem, research strategy, and findings: A shift toward more sustainable transportation requires both adequate pricing of externalities from driving and supportive land use policies. However, proponents of each approach often under-estimate the complementarity and potential synergy between them. This study investigates the interaction effects between gasoline prices and land use (policy) variables using a panel dataset of transit ridership in 67 urbanized areas between 2002 and 2010. We found that while doubling the average gasoline price would increase transit ridership by 8.4% in an urbanized area with mean density and no regional containment policy, in areas with slightly higher density and a regional containment policy, the impact of higher gasoline prices would rise to 21%. In communities that had adopted a package of smart growth land use options, the impact of higher gasoline prices on transit use is even greater.Takeaway for practice: Pricing schemes will be more effective where alternatives to automobility and supportive land use policies exist. The impacts of urban form on travel behavior are also strengthened when driving externalities are correctly priced. Planners and policymakers should take advantage of the complementarity between pricing and land use planning approaches by implementing policies in combined and well-coordinated ways.

AB - Problem, research strategy, and findings: A shift toward more sustainable transportation requires both adequate pricing of externalities from driving and supportive land use policies. However, proponents of each approach often under-estimate the complementarity and potential synergy between them. This study investigates the interaction effects between gasoline prices and land use (policy) variables using a panel dataset of transit ridership in 67 urbanized areas between 2002 and 2010. We found that while doubling the average gasoline price would increase transit ridership by 8.4% in an urbanized area with mean density and no regional containment policy, in areas with slightly higher density and a regional containment policy, the impact of higher gasoline prices would rise to 21%. In communities that had adopted a package of smart growth land use options, the impact of higher gasoline prices on transit use is even greater.Takeaway for practice: Pricing schemes will be more effective where alternatives to automobility and supportive land use policies exist. The impacts of urban form on travel behavior are also strengthened when driving externalities are correctly priced. Planners and policymakers should take advantage of the complementarity between pricing and land use planning approaches by implementing policies in combined and well-coordinated ways.

KW - complement

KW - elasticity

KW - land use planning

KW - pricing

KW - transit ridership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902980890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902980890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01944363.2014.915629

DO - 10.1080/01944363.2014.915629

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902980890

VL - 79

SP - 314

EP - 328

JO - Journal of the American Planning Association

JF - Journal of the American Planning Association

SN - 0194-4363

IS - 4

ER -