Competition and facilitation: Contrasting effects of Artemisia Tridentata on desert vs. montane pines

Ragan M. Callaway, Evan H. Delucia, Darrin Moore, Robert Nowak, William H. Schlesinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Circumstantial evidence suggests that Artemisia tridentata may out-compete Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi for water at ecotones between shrub steppe and montane forest vegetation in the Great Basin. Other studies indicate that within the shrub steppe Artemisia may act as a nurse plant for a third species of pine, P. monophylla. We used field experiments to study these contrasting effects of Artemisia on P. ponderosa and P. monophylla within the context of the distributional patterns in western Nevada of all three species on andesite, and on sites where hydrothermal activity has altered the andesite. At intermediate elevations in the Great Basin Artemisia and P. monophylla are restricted to unaltered desert soils, whereas P. ponderosa is restricted to acidic, nutrient-poor altered andesite. Although mature P. monophylla were virtually absent in our study plots on altered andesite, first- and second-year seedlings were common. On adjacent unaltered andesite, all size classes of P. monophylla occurred, and P. monophylla seedlings were associated with Artemisia shrubs. Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi adults and seedlings were rare on unaltered andesite, but a wide range of size classes was found on altered andesite. In experiments, all P. ponderosa seedlings on unaltered andesite were consumed by predators regardless of positive or negative spatial association with shrubs. Of the P. monophylla seedlings that germinated on unaltered andesite, all that were under shrubs survived, but only 6% of those that germinated in the intershrub spaces survived. On the open altered andesite the mortality of P. monophylla seedlings due to abiotic stress was high, with a final survival of only 3%, whereas 28% of P. ponderosa seedlings survived the first growing season on altered andesite. On unaltered andesite, survival and conductance of P. ponderosa saplings was enhanced by shrub removal, but P. monophylla survival was significantly higher under shrubs than in shrub-removal plots or in intershrub spaces. In Artemisia-removal experiments, we found that Artemisia competed with P. ponderosa seedlings and saplings for water. Removal of Artemisia decreased water use efficiency (WUE) of P. monophylla seedlings. The absence of Artemisia may restrict Pinus monophylla from outcrops of altered andesite in the Great Basin, but provide refuges for P. ponderosa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2130-2141
Number of pages12
JournalEcology
Volume77
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Artemisia tridentata
facilitation
andesite
deserts
desert
Pinus
Pinus ponderosa
Artemisia
seedling
shrub
shrubs
seedlings
basins
sapling
saplings
steppes
steppe
effect
Pinus monophylla
basin

Keywords

  • Altered andesite
  • Artemisia tridentata
  • Competition
  • Facilitation
  • Field experiments
  • Gas exchange
  • Great basin desert
  • Interference
  • Pinus monophylla
  • Pinus ponderosa
  • Plant interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Competition and facilitation : Contrasting effects of Artemisia Tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. / Callaway, Ragan M.; Delucia, Evan H.; Moore, Darrin; Nowak, Robert; Schlesinger, William H.

In: Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 7, 01.01.1996, p. 2130-2141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callaway, Ragan M. ; Delucia, Evan H. ; Moore, Darrin ; Nowak, Robert ; Schlesinger, William H. / Competition and facilitation : Contrasting effects of Artemisia Tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. In: Ecology. 1996 ; Vol. 77, No. 7. pp. 2130-2141.
@article{14b3538994fa4244a6f0849012e8e449,
title = "Competition and facilitation: Contrasting effects of Artemisia Tridentata on desert vs. montane pines",
abstract = "Circumstantial evidence suggests that Artemisia tridentata may out-compete Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi for water at ecotones between shrub steppe and montane forest vegetation in the Great Basin. Other studies indicate that within the shrub steppe Artemisia may act as a nurse plant for a third species of pine, P. monophylla. We used field experiments to study these contrasting effects of Artemisia on P. ponderosa and P. monophylla within the context of the distributional patterns in western Nevada of all three species on andesite, and on sites where hydrothermal activity has altered the andesite. At intermediate elevations in the Great Basin Artemisia and P. monophylla are restricted to unaltered desert soils, whereas P. ponderosa is restricted to acidic, nutrient-poor altered andesite. Although mature P. monophylla were virtually absent in our study plots on altered andesite, first- and second-year seedlings were common. On adjacent unaltered andesite, all size classes of P. monophylla occurred, and P. monophylla seedlings were associated with Artemisia shrubs. Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi adults and seedlings were rare on unaltered andesite, but a wide range of size classes was found on altered andesite. In experiments, all P. ponderosa seedlings on unaltered andesite were consumed by predators regardless of positive or negative spatial association with shrubs. Of the P. monophylla seedlings that germinated on unaltered andesite, all that were under shrubs survived, but only 6{\%} of those that germinated in the intershrub spaces survived. On the open altered andesite the mortality of P. monophylla seedlings due to abiotic stress was high, with a final survival of only 3{\%}, whereas 28{\%} of P. ponderosa seedlings survived the first growing season on altered andesite. On unaltered andesite, survival and conductance of P. ponderosa saplings was enhanced by shrub removal, but P. monophylla survival was significantly higher under shrubs than in shrub-removal plots or in intershrub spaces. In Artemisia-removal experiments, we found that Artemisia competed with P. ponderosa seedlings and saplings for water. Removal of Artemisia decreased water use efficiency (WUE) of P. monophylla seedlings. The absence of Artemisia may restrict Pinus monophylla from outcrops of altered andesite in the Great Basin, but provide refuges for P. ponderosa.",
keywords = "Altered andesite, Artemisia tridentata, Competition, Facilitation, Field experiments, Gas exchange, Great basin desert, Interference, Pinus monophylla, Pinus ponderosa, Plant interactions",
author = "Callaway, {Ragan M.} and Delucia, {Evan H.} and Darrin Moore and Robert Nowak and Schlesinger, {William H.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2265707",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "2130--2141",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competition and facilitation

T2 - Contrasting effects of Artemisia Tridentata on desert vs. montane pines

AU - Callaway, Ragan M.

AU - Delucia, Evan H.

AU - Moore, Darrin

AU - Nowak, Robert

AU - Schlesinger, William H.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Circumstantial evidence suggests that Artemisia tridentata may out-compete Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi for water at ecotones between shrub steppe and montane forest vegetation in the Great Basin. Other studies indicate that within the shrub steppe Artemisia may act as a nurse plant for a third species of pine, P. monophylla. We used field experiments to study these contrasting effects of Artemisia on P. ponderosa and P. monophylla within the context of the distributional patterns in western Nevada of all three species on andesite, and on sites where hydrothermal activity has altered the andesite. At intermediate elevations in the Great Basin Artemisia and P. monophylla are restricted to unaltered desert soils, whereas P. ponderosa is restricted to acidic, nutrient-poor altered andesite. Although mature P. monophylla were virtually absent in our study plots on altered andesite, first- and second-year seedlings were common. On adjacent unaltered andesite, all size classes of P. monophylla occurred, and P. monophylla seedlings were associated with Artemisia shrubs. Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi adults and seedlings were rare on unaltered andesite, but a wide range of size classes was found on altered andesite. In experiments, all P. ponderosa seedlings on unaltered andesite were consumed by predators regardless of positive or negative spatial association with shrubs. Of the P. monophylla seedlings that germinated on unaltered andesite, all that were under shrubs survived, but only 6% of those that germinated in the intershrub spaces survived. On the open altered andesite the mortality of P. monophylla seedlings due to abiotic stress was high, with a final survival of only 3%, whereas 28% of P. ponderosa seedlings survived the first growing season on altered andesite. On unaltered andesite, survival and conductance of P. ponderosa saplings was enhanced by shrub removal, but P. monophylla survival was significantly higher under shrubs than in shrub-removal plots or in intershrub spaces. In Artemisia-removal experiments, we found that Artemisia competed with P. ponderosa seedlings and saplings for water. Removal of Artemisia decreased water use efficiency (WUE) of P. monophylla seedlings. The absence of Artemisia may restrict Pinus monophylla from outcrops of altered andesite in the Great Basin, but provide refuges for P. ponderosa.

AB - Circumstantial evidence suggests that Artemisia tridentata may out-compete Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi for water at ecotones between shrub steppe and montane forest vegetation in the Great Basin. Other studies indicate that within the shrub steppe Artemisia may act as a nurse plant for a third species of pine, P. monophylla. We used field experiments to study these contrasting effects of Artemisia on P. ponderosa and P. monophylla within the context of the distributional patterns in western Nevada of all three species on andesite, and on sites where hydrothermal activity has altered the andesite. At intermediate elevations in the Great Basin Artemisia and P. monophylla are restricted to unaltered desert soils, whereas P. ponderosa is restricted to acidic, nutrient-poor altered andesite. Although mature P. monophylla were virtually absent in our study plots on altered andesite, first- and second-year seedlings were common. On adjacent unaltered andesite, all size classes of P. monophylla occurred, and P. monophylla seedlings were associated with Artemisia shrubs. Pinus ponderosa and P. jefferyi adults and seedlings were rare on unaltered andesite, but a wide range of size classes was found on altered andesite. In experiments, all P. ponderosa seedlings on unaltered andesite were consumed by predators regardless of positive or negative spatial association with shrubs. Of the P. monophylla seedlings that germinated on unaltered andesite, all that were under shrubs survived, but only 6% of those that germinated in the intershrub spaces survived. On the open altered andesite the mortality of P. monophylla seedlings due to abiotic stress was high, with a final survival of only 3%, whereas 28% of P. ponderosa seedlings survived the first growing season on altered andesite. On unaltered andesite, survival and conductance of P. ponderosa saplings was enhanced by shrub removal, but P. monophylla survival was significantly higher under shrubs than in shrub-removal plots or in intershrub spaces. In Artemisia-removal experiments, we found that Artemisia competed with P. ponderosa seedlings and saplings for water. Removal of Artemisia decreased water use efficiency (WUE) of P. monophylla seedlings. The absence of Artemisia may restrict Pinus monophylla from outcrops of altered andesite in the Great Basin, but provide refuges for P. ponderosa.

KW - Altered andesite

KW - Artemisia tridentata

KW - Competition

KW - Facilitation

KW - Field experiments

KW - Gas exchange

KW - Great basin desert

KW - Interference

KW - Pinus monophylla

KW - Pinus ponderosa

KW - Plant interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030431937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030431937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2265707

DO - 10.2307/2265707

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030431937

VL - 77

SP - 2130

EP - 2141

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 7

ER -