Comparisons of models of associative recall

Brian H Ross, Gordon H. Bower

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We tested three mathematical models of associative recall that differ in the assumed structure of the memory trace (direct or indirect connections between parts) and the interdependence of the connections (independent or correlated). The three models compared are the "horizontal" model with direct, independent connections, the "schema" model with indirect, independent connections, and the "fragment" model with indirect, correlated connections. In Experiment 1, subjects studied quartets of minimally related words and then recalled, using one or two words of each quartet as cues. The horizontal and schema models predicted the data very well, but the fragment model did poorly. In Experiment 2, related word quintets were learned, and recall cues contained one, two, or three words of a quintet. Only the schema model adequately fit these data. Experiment 3 directly tested the fragment model, using sequential tests of unrelated word quartets. Even an augmented fragment model with extra recall failure parameters was decisively rejected by these data. Both the horizontal and schema models gave satisfactory qualitative accounts, although poor quantitative fits. A means of deriving the models through a spreading activation semantic network of preexperimental knowledge is suggested, and related models are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Cues
Semantics
Theoretical Models
Associative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Comparisons of models of associative recall. / Ross, Brian H; Bower, Gordon H.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1981, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ross, Brian H ; Bower, Gordon H. / Comparisons of models of associative recall. In: Memory & Cognition. 1981 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 1-16.
@article{86ae15342d414a9b87fe047fab2b60ba,
title = "Comparisons of models of associative recall",
abstract = "We tested three mathematical models of associative recall that differ in the assumed structure of the memory trace (direct or indirect connections between parts) and the interdependence of the connections (independent or correlated). The three models compared are the {"}horizontal{"} model with direct, independent connections, the {"}schema{"} model with indirect, independent connections, and the {"}fragment{"} model with indirect, correlated connections. In Experiment 1, subjects studied quartets of minimally related words and then recalled, using one or two words of each quartet as cues. The horizontal and schema models predicted the data very well, but the fragment model did poorly. In Experiment 2, related word quintets were learned, and recall cues contained one, two, or three words of a quintet. Only the schema model adequately fit these data. Experiment 3 directly tested the fragment model, using sequential tests of unrelated word quartets. Even an augmented fragment model with extra recall failure parameters was decisively rejected by these data. Both the horizontal and schema models gave satisfactory qualitative accounts, although poor quantitative fits. A means of deriving the models through a spreading activation semantic network of preexperimental knowledge is suggested, and related models are discussed.",
author = "Ross, {Brian H} and Bower, {Gordon H.}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196946",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of models of associative recall

AU - Ross, Brian H

AU - Bower, Gordon H.

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - We tested three mathematical models of associative recall that differ in the assumed structure of the memory trace (direct or indirect connections between parts) and the interdependence of the connections (independent or correlated). The three models compared are the "horizontal" model with direct, independent connections, the "schema" model with indirect, independent connections, and the "fragment" model with indirect, correlated connections. In Experiment 1, subjects studied quartets of minimally related words and then recalled, using one or two words of each quartet as cues. The horizontal and schema models predicted the data very well, but the fragment model did poorly. In Experiment 2, related word quintets were learned, and recall cues contained one, two, or three words of a quintet. Only the schema model adequately fit these data. Experiment 3 directly tested the fragment model, using sequential tests of unrelated word quartets. Even an augmented fragment model with extra recall failure parameters was decisively rejected by these data. Both the horizontal and schema models gave satisfactory qualitative accounts, although poor quantitative fits. A means of deriving the models through a spreading activation semantic network of preexperimental knowledge is suggested, and related models are discussed.

AB - We tested three mathematical models of associative recall that differ in the assumed structure of the memory trace (direct or indirect connections between parts) and the interdependence of the connections (independent or correlated). The three models compared are the "horizontal" model with direct, independent connections, the "schema" model with indirect, independent connections, and the "fragment" model with indirect, correlated connections. In Experiment 1, subjects studied quartets of minimally related words and then recalled, using one or two words of each quartet as cues. The horizontal and schema models predicted the data very well, but the fragment model did poorly. In Experiment 2, related word quintets were learned, and recall cues contained one, two, or three words of a quintet. Only the schema model adequately fit these data. Experiment 3 directly tested the fragment model, using sequential tests of unrelated word quartets. Even an augmented fragment model with extra recall failure parameters was decisively rejected by these data. Both the horizontal and schema models gave satisfactory qualitative accounts, although poor quantitative fits. A means of deriving the models through a spreading activation semantic network of preexperimental knowledge is suggested, and related models are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019485680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019485680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196946

DO - 10.3758/BF03196946

M3 - Article

C2 - 7231163

AN - SCOPUS:0019485680

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -