Comparison of machine learning and electrical resistivity arrays to inverse modeling for locating and characterizing subsurface targets

Ahsan Jamil, Dale F. Rucker, Dan Lu, Scott C. Brooks, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky, Huiping Cao, Kenneth C. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms and electrical resistivity (ER) arrays for inversion with comparison to a conventional Gauss-Newton numerical inversion method. Four different ML models and four arrays were used for the estimation of only six variables for locating and characterizing hypothetical subsurface targets. The combination of dipole-dipole with Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN) had the highest accuracy. Evaluation showed that both MLP-NN and Gauss-Newton methods performed well for estimating the matrix resistivity while target resistivity accuracy was lower, and MLP-NN produced sharper contrast at target boundaries for the field and hypothetical data. Both methods exhibited comparable target characterization performance, whereas MLP-NN had increased accuracy compared to Gauss-Newton in prediction of target width and height, which was attributed to numerical smoothing present in the Gauss-Newton approach. MLP-NN was also applied to a field dataset acquired at U.S. DOE Hanford site.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105493
JournalJournal of Applied Geophysics
Volume229
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Boosting
  • Electrical resistivity
  • Geophysics
  • Machine learning
  • Neural networks
  • Random forests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of machine learning and electrical resistivity arrays to inverse modeling for locating and characterizing subsurface targets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this