TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of label-free biosensing in microplate, microfluidic, and spot-based affinity capture assays
AU - Choi, Charles J.
AU - Belobraydich, Alysia R.
AU - Chan, Leo L.
AU - Mathias, Patrick C.
AU - Cunningham, Brian T.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Using both experimental assays and fluid-dynamic finite element simulation models, we directly compared the achievable performance limits of four distinct assay configurations for label-free detection of an analyte from a test sample on a biosensor surface. The assay configurations studied in this work included a biosensor incorporated into the bottom surface of a microplate well and a microfluidic channel. For each configuration, we compared assay performance for the scenario in which the entire bottom surface of the fluid-handling vessel is coated with capture ligands with assay performance for the scenario in which the capture ligands are applied in the form of localized spots. As a model system, we used detection of the protein biomarker tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) using immobilized TNF-α capture antibody. Results show that the microfluidic assay format dramatically reduces the time required to establish a stable equilibrium. Spot-based assays are advantageous for microplate-based detection for reducing the time required for equilibrium sensor response. The results derived are generally applicable to any label-free biosensor technology and any ligand-analyte system with adjustable variables that include sensor mass density sensitivity, analyte-ligand adsorption/desorption rate constants, immobilized ligand density, flow channel geometry, flow rate, and spot size.
AB - Using both experimental assays and fluid-dynamic finite element simulation models, we directly compared the achievable performance limits of four distinct assay configurations for label-free detection of an analyte from a test sample on a biosensor surface. The assay configurations studied in this work included a biosensor incorporated into the bottom surface of a microplate well and a microfluidic channel. For each configuration, we compared assay performance for the scenario in which the entire bottom surface of the fluid-handling vessel is coated with capture ligands with assay performance for the scenario in which the capture ligands are applied in the form of localized spots. As a model system, we used detection of the protein biomarker tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) using immobilized TNF-α capture antibody. Results show that the microfluidic assay format dramatically reduces the time required to establish a stable equilibrium. Spot-based assays are advantageous for microplate-based detection for reducing the time required for equilibrium sensor response. The results derived are generally applicable to any label-free biosensor technology and any ligand-analyte system with adjustable variables that include sensor mass density sensitivity, analyte-ligand adsorption/desorption rate constants, immobilized ligand density, flow channel geometry, flow rate, and spot size.
KW - Capture affinity assay
KW - Label-free biosensor
KW - Microfluidic
KW - Microplate
KW - Photonic crystal
KW - Spot-based assay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955094957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955094957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 20553867
AN - SCOPUS:77955094957
SN - 0003-2697
VL - 405
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Analytical Biochemistry
JF - Analytical Biochemistry
IS - 1
ER -