Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and computed tomographic analysis

Amy Joan Somrak, Stephen Joslyn, David J. Schaeffer, Sandra Manfra Marretta, Jodi Matheson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the buccal and dorsal approaches for surgical extraction of mandibular canine teeth in the cat. Parameters evaluated included extraction time, surgical wound closure time, volume of bone loss, and incidence of complications. Both mandibular canine teeth were extracted from each of 12 feline cadaver specimens, using a different surgical approach for each side, and recording the time for extraction and closure. Computed tomography was used to measure the volume of each rostral mandible before and after extraction, and the bone loss for each approach was computed. The mean extraction time and volume of bone loss was less for the buccal approach, but the results were not statistically significant (P=0.22 and P=0.32, respectively). The closure time for the dorsal approach was significantly less than for the buccal approach (P=0.023). Total time (extraction plus closure time) was not significantly different between the approaches (P=0.40). There were no complications associated with either approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-238
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Veterinary Dentistry
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and computed tomographic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this