Comparing the social values of ecosystem services in US and Australian marine protected areas

Dana N. Johnson, Carena J Van Riper, Maria Chu, Sophia Winkler-Schor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spatially explicit models for conservation planning often rely on environmental and economic indicators to prioritize management decisions. Consideration of social values in relation to landscape metrics is less common, especially across different biophysical contexts. In this paper, we compare social values mapped by outdoor recreationists who visited Santa Cruz Island within Channel Islands National Park, USA, and Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia using a Social Values for Ecosystem Services mapping tool that interfaced with Maximum Entropy modeling. Specifically, we determine the relative importance of 12 social values and evaluate how the relationship between three highly rated social values (Aesthetic, Biological Diversity, and Recreation) and four biophysical metrics (distance to the coast, distance to management infrastructure, slope, and elevation) differed between two marine protected areas. Our results provide insight into the spatial dynamics of social-ecological data to identify high and low priority locations in protected areas as well as enable resource management agencies to make more informed decisions about how best to engage with stakeholders. This research also supports public involvement in policy-making about land and seascapes in the USA and Australia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100919
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Values
social benefit
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Ecosystem
protected area
conservation areas
Values
national park
Islands
Channel Islands
national parks
economic indicators
Recreation
environmental indicators
research support
Policy Making
management decision
Biodiversity
aesthetics

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Marine spatial planning
  • PPGIS
  • Recreation
  • Social values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Comparing the social values of ecosystem services in US and Australian marine protected areas. / Johnson, Dana N.; Van Riper, Carena J; Chu, Maria; Winkler-Schor, Sophia.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 37, 100919, 01.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7123041b278b49eeaa5bc602d1660b4b,
title = "Comparing the social values of ecosystem services in US and Australian marine protected areas",
abstract = "Spatially explicit models for conservation planning often rely on environmental and economic indicators to prioritize management decisions. Consideration of social values in relation to landscape metrics is less common, especially across different biophysical contexts. In this paper, we compare social values mapped by outdoor recreationists who visited Santa Cruz Island within Channel Islands National Park, USA, and Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia using a Social Values for Ecosystem Services mapping tool that interfaced with Maximum Entropy modeling. Specifically, we determine the relative importance of 12 social values and evaluate how the relationship between three highly rated social values (Aesthetic, Biological Diversity, and Recreation) and four biophysical metrics (distance to the coast, distance to management infrastructure, slope, and elevation) differed between two marine protected areas. Our results provide insight into the spatial dynamics of social-ecological data to identify high and low priority locations in protected areas as well as enable resource management agencies to make more informed decisions about how best to engage with stakeholders. This research also supports public involvement in policy-making about land and seascapes in the USA and Australia.",
keywords = "Ecosystem services, Marine spatial planning, PPGIS, Recreation, Social values",
author = "Johnson, {Dana N.} and {Van Riper}, {Carena J} and Maria Chu and Sophia Winkler-Schor",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100919",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the social values of ecosystem services in US and Australian marine protected areas

AU - Johnson, Dana N.

AU - Van Riper, Carena J

AU - Chu, Maria

AU - Winkler-Schor, Sophia

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Spatially explicit models for conservation planning often rely on environmental and economic indicators to prioritize management decisions. Consideration of social values in relation to landscape metrics is less common, especially across different biophysical contexts. In this paper, we compare social values mapped by outdoor recreationists who visited Santa Cruz Island within Channel Islands National Park, USA, and Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia using a Social Values for Ecosystem Services mapping tool that interfaced with Maximum Entropy modeling. Specifically, we determine the relative importance of 12 social values and evaluate how the relationship between three highly rated social values (Aesthetic, Biological Diversity, and Recreation) and four biophysical metrics (distance to the coast, distance to management infrastructure, slope, and elevation) differed between two marine protected areas. Our results provide insight into the spatial dynamics of social-ecological data to identify high and low priority locations in protected areas as well as enable resource management agencies to make more informed decisions about how best to engage with stakeholders. This research also supports public involvement in policy-making about land and seascapes in the USA and Australia.

AB - Spatially explicit models for conservation planning often rely on environmental and economic indicators to prioritize management decisions. Consideration of social values in relation to landscape metrics is less common, especially across different biophysical contexts. In this paper, we compare social values mapped by outdoor recreationists who visited Santa Cruz Island within Channel Islands National Park, USA, and Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia using a Social Values for Ecosystem Services mapping tool that interfaced with Maximum Entropy modeling. Specifically, we determine the relative importance of 12 social values and evaluate how the relationship between three highly rated social values (Aesthetic, Biological Diversity, and Recreation) and four biophysical metrics (distance to the coast, distance to management infrastructure, slope, and elevation) differed between two marine protected areas. Our results provide insight into the spatial dynamics of social-ecological data to identify high and low priority locations in protected areas as well as enable resource management agencies to make more informed decisions about how best to engage with stakeholders. This research also supports public involvement in policy-making about land and seascapes in the USA and Australia.

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Marine spatial planning

KW - PPGIS

KW - Recreation

KW - Social values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063536400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063536400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100919

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100919

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 100919

ER -