TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing speech recognition for listeners with normal and impaired hearing
T2 - Simulations for controlling differences in speech levels and spectral shape
AU - Fogerty, Daniel
AU - Madorskiy, Rachel
AU - Ahlstrom, Jayne B.
AU - Dubno, Judy R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (Grant R01 DC015465, awarded to DF, and R01 DC000184, awarded to JRD), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Grant UL1 TR001450, awarded to MUSC). Some of the research were conducted in a facility constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Program (Grant C06 RR 014516, awarded to MUSC) from the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources. The authors would like to thank Blythe Vickery and Briemma Wilson for their research assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Purpose: This study investigated methods used to simulate factors associated with reduced audibility, increased speech levels, and spectral shaping for aided older adults with hearing loss. Simulations provided to younger normal-hearing adults were used to investigate the effect of sensation level, speech presentation level, and spectral shape in comparison to older adults with hearing loss. Method: Measures were assessed in quiet, steady-state noise, and speech-modulated noise. Older adults with hearing loss listened to speech that was spectrally shaped according to their hearing thresholds. Younger adults with normal hearing listened to speech that simulated the hearing-impaired group’s (a) reduced audibility, (b) increased speech levels, and (c) spectral shaping. Group comparisons were made based on speech recognition performance and masking release. Additionally, younger adults completed measures of listening effort and perceived speech quality to assess if differences across simulations in these outcome measures were similar to those for speech recognition. Results: Across the various simulations employed, testing in the presence of a threshold matching noise best matched differences in speech recognition and masking release between younger and older adults. This result remained consistent across the other two outcome measures. Conclusions: A combination of audibility, speech level, and spectral shape factors is required to simulate differences between listeners with normal and impaired hearing in recognition, listening effort, and perceived speech quality. The use of spectrally shaped and amplified speech in the presence of threshold matching noise best provided this simulated control.
AB - Purpose: This study investigated methods used to simulate factors associated with reduced audibility, increased speech levels, and spectral shaping for aided older adults with hearing loss. Simulations provided to younger normal-hearing adults were used to investigate the effect of sensation level, speech presentation level, and spectral shape in comparison to older adults with hearing loss. Method: Measures were assessed in quiet, steady-state noise, and speech-modulated noise. Older adults with hearing loss listened to speech that was spectrally shaped according to their hearing thresholds. Younger adults with normal hearing listened to speech that simulated the hearing-impaired group’s (a) reduced audibility, (b) increased speech levels, and (c) spectral shaping. Group comparisons were made based on speech recognition performance and masking release. Additionally, younger adults completed measures of listening effort and perceived speech quality to assess if differences across simulations in these outcome measures were similar to those for speech recognition. Results: Across the various simulations employed, testing in the presence of a threshold matching noise best matched differences in speech recognition and masking release between younger and older adults. This result remained consistent across the other two outcome measures. Conclusions: A combination of audibility, speech level, and spectral shape factors is required to simulate differences between listeners with normal and impaired hearing in recognition, listening effort, and perceived speech quality. The use of spectrally shaped and amplified speech in the presence of threshold matching noise best provided this simulated control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097850211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097850211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00246
DO - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00246
M3 - Article
C2 - 33197359
AN - SCOPUS:85097850211
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 63
SP - 4289
EP - 4299
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 12
ER -