TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Study of Digital Electronics Learning
T2 - 2024 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
AU - Peter, Ojonugwa Oluwafemi Ejiga
AU - Akingbola, Oluwapemiisin Gbemisola
AU - Abiodun, Pelumi Olaitan
AU - Rahman, Md Mahmudur
AU - Shourabi, Neda Bazyar
AU - Goddard, Lynford
AU - Owolabi, Oludare Adegbola
N1 - This study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant # 1915615, titled \u201CAdapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase Student Achievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines\u201D. It should be noted that the opinions, results and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
PY - 2024/6/23
Y1 - 2024/6/23
N2 - In the dynamic landscape of engineering education, the significance of hands-on experimentation in Digital Electronics, including Computer Architecture and Digital Logic, cannot be understated. The core inquiry of this study is determining whether the integration of standalone printed circuit board (PCB) hardware augments conceptual understanding and engagement compared to conventional electronic instrument-based methods. Although both methods use the experiment-centered pedagogy (ECP) framework, the objective is to identify which method provides enhanced comprehension of core concepts and practical applications. Using a quantitative method anchored in pragmatic research philosophy, the efficacy of learning outcomes and practical applications were scrutinized. One semester leveraged PCB tools, while the previous semester utilized conventional techniques. Feedback was garnered from educators and students, with SPSS facilitating statistical analysis. Additionally, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) were utilized for sentiment analysis. The comparative study highlights the superiority of the PCB method over traditional approaches in digital electronics education for engineering students. Key findings include a 23% higher initial comprehension score (83% for PCB vs. 60% for traditional in pre-test)and a slight edge in retention and understanding (80% for PCB vs. 76% for traditional in post-test). Active learning and hands-on activities were significantly more prevalent in PCB classes, with a 100% engagement rate in practical group activities compared to none in traditional settings. Sentiment analysis showed a 75% positive response towards the PCB method, indicating a strong preference and perceived effectiveness among students. These results indicate that PCB incorporation augments supported learning and the grasp of core concepts and positively influences student perceptions and conceptions. This proactive engagement pushes learners towards a collaborative learning environment, accentuating group discussions, peer tutoring, and troubleshooting activities. To conclude, traditional methods have their place, but PCB integration in the Digital Electronics curriculum seems paramount in elevating learning efficacy and student engagement, underlining the imperative of hands-on, experiential learning in today's engineering education framework.
AB - In the dynamic landscape of engineering education, the significance of hands-on experimentation in Digital Electronics, including Computer Architecture and Digital Logic, cannot be understated. The core inquiry of this study is determining whether the integration of standalone printed circuit board (PCB) hardware augments conceptual understanding and engagement compared to conventional electronic instrument-based methods. Although both methods use the experiment-centered pedagogy (ECP) framework, the objective is to identify which method provides enhanced comprehension of core concepts and practical applications. Using a quantitative method anchored in pragmatic research philosophy, the efficacy of learning outcomes and practical applications were scrutinized. One semester leveraged PCB tools, while the previous semester utilized conventional techniques. Feedback was garnered from educators and students, with SPSS facilitating statistical analysis. Additionally, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) were utilized for sentiment analysis. The comparative study highlights the superiority of the PCB method over traditional approaches in digital electronics education for engineering students. Key findings include a 23% higher initial comprehension score (83% for PCB vs. 60% for traditional in pre-test)and a slight edge in retention and understanding (80% for PCB vs. 76% for traditional in post-test). Active learning and hands-on activities were significantly more prevalent in PCB classes, with a 100% engagement rate in practical group activities compared to none in traditional settings. Sentiment analysis showed a 75% positive response towards the PCB method, indicating a strong preference and perceived effectiveness among students. These results indicate that PCB incorporation augments supported learning and the grasp of core concepts and positively influences student perceptions and conceptions. This proactive engagement pushes learners towards a collaborative learning environment, accentuating group discussions, peer tutoring, and troubleshooting activities. To conclude, traditional methods have their place, but PCB integration in the Digital Electronics curriculum seems paramount in elevating learning efficacy and student engagement, underlining the imperative of hands-on, experiential learning in today's engineering education framework.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202046456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85202046456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85202046456
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 23 June 2024 through 26 June 2024
ER -