Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses

Hao Luo, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Arthur R Schmidt, Marcelo Horacio Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The complexity of open channel confluences stems from flow mixing, secondary circulation, post-confluence flow separation, contraction and backwater effects. These effects in turn result in a large number of parameters required to adequately quantify the junction induced hydraulic resistance and describe mean flow pattern and turbulent flow structures due to flow merging. The recent development in computing power advances the application of 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes to visualize and understand the Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone (CHZ). Nevertheless, 1D approaches remain the mainstay in large drainage network or waterway system modeling considering computational efficiency and data availability. This paper presents (i) a modified 1D nonlinear dynamic model; (ii) a fully 3D non-hydrostatic, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Equations (RANS)-based, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model; (iii) an analysis of changing confluence hydrodynamics and 3D turbulent flow structure under various controls; (iv) a comparison of flow features (i.e. upstream water depths, energy losses and post-confluence contraction) predicted by 1D and 3D models; and (v) parameterization of 3D flow characteristics in 1D modeling through the computation of correction coefficients associated with contraction, energy and momentum. The present comprehensive 3D numerical investigation highlights the driving mechanisms for junction induced energy losses. Moreover, the comparative 1D and 3D study quantifies the deviation of 1D approximations and associated underlying assumptions from the ‘true’ resultant flow field. The study may also shed light on improving the accuracy of the 1D large network modeling through the parameterization of the complex 3D feature of the flow field and correction of interior boundary conditions at junctions of larger angles and/or with substantial lateral inflows. Moreover, the enclosed numerical investigations may enhance the understanding of the primary mechanisms contributing to hydraulic structure induced turbulent flow behavior and increased hydraulic resistance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-139
Number of pages20
JournalAdvances in Water Resources
Volume117
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

confluence
turbulent flow
contraction
energy
flow structure
computational fluid dynamics
flow field
parameterization
hydrodynamics
modeling
hydraulics
backwater
hydraulic structure
drainage network
flow pattern
momentum
water depth
inflow
boundary condition
loss

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Energy loss
  • Hydraulic resistance
  • Nonlinear mathematical models
  • Open channel junctions
  • Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses. / Luo, Hao; Fytanidis, Dimitrios K.; Schmidt, Arthur R; Garcia, Marcelo Horacio.

In: Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 117, 07.2018, p. 120-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d37022d45c0844db8fbb7c15aadf96d5,
title = "Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses",
abstract = "The complexity of open channel confluences stems from flow mixing, secondary circulation, post-confluence flow separation, contraction and backwater effects. These effects in turn result in a large number of parameters required to adequately quantify the junction induced hydraulic resistance and describe mean flow pattern and turbulent flow structures due to flow merging. The recent development in computing power advances the application of 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes to visualize and understand the Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone (CHZ). Nevertheless, 1D approaches remain the mainstay in large drainage network or waterway system modeling considering computational efficiency and data availability. This paper presents (i) a modified 1D nonlinear dynamic model; (ii) a fully 3D non-hydrostatic, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Equations (RANS)-based, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model; (iii) an analysis of changing confluence hydrodynamics and 3D turbulent flow structure under various controls; (iv) a comparison of flow features (i.e. upstream water depths, energy losses and post-confluence contraction) predicted by 1D and 3D models; and (v) parameterization of 3D flow characteristics in 1D modeling through the computation of correction coefficients associated with contraction, energy and momentum. The present comprehensive 3D numerical investigation highlights the driving mechanisms for junction induced energy losses. Moreover, the comparative 1D and 3D study quantifies the deviation of 1D approximations and associated underlying assumptions from the ‘true’ resultant flow field. The study may also shed light on improving the accuracy of the 1D large network modeling through the parameterization of the complex 3D feature of the flow field and correction of interior boundary conditions at junctions of larger angles and/or with substantial lateral inflows. Moreover, the enclosed numerical investigations may enhance the understanding of the primary mechanisms contributing to hydraulic structure induced turbulent flow behavior and increased hydraulic resistance.",
keywords = "Computational fluid dynamics, Energy loss, Hydraulic resistance, Nonlinear mathematical models, Open channel junctions, Turbulence",
author = "Hao Luo and Fytanidis, {Dimitrios K.} and Schmidt, {Arthur R} and Garcia, {Marcelo Horacio}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "120--139",
journal = "Advances in Water Resources",
issn = "0309-1708",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses

AU - Luo, Hao

AU - Fytanidis, Dimitrios K.

AU - Schmidt, Arthur R

AU - Garcia, Marcelo Horacio

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - The complexity of open channel confluences stems from flow mixing, secondary circulation, post-confluence flow separation, contraction and backwater effects. These effects in turn result in a large number of parameters required to adequately quantify the junction induced hydraulic resistance and describe mean flow pattern and turbulent flow structures due to flow merging. The recent development in computing power advances the application of 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes to visualize and understand the Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone (CHZ). Nevertheless, 1D approaches remain the mainstay in large drainage network or waterway system modeling considering computational efficiency and data availability. This paper presents (i) a modified 1D nonlinear dynamic model; (ii) a fully 3D non-hydrostatic, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Equations (RANS)-based, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model; (iii) an analysis of changing confluence hydrodynamics and 3D turbulent flow structure under various controls; (iv) a comparison of flow features (i.e. upstream water depths, energy losses and post-confluence contraction) predicted by 1D and 3D models; and (v) parameterization of 3D flow characteristics in 1D modeling through the computation of correction coefficients associated with contraction, energy and momentum. The present comprehensive 3D numerical investigation highlights the driving mechanisms for junction induced energy losses. Moreover, the comparative 1D and 3D study quantifies the deviation of 1D approximations and associated underlying assumptions from the ‘true’ resultant flow field. The study may also shed light on improving the accuracy of the 1D large network modeling through the parameterization of the complex 3D feature of the flow field and correction of interior boundary conditions at junctions of larger angles and/or with substantial lateral inflows. Moreover, the enclosed numerical investigations may enhance the understanding of the primary mechanisms contributing to hydraulic structure induced turbulent flow behavior and increased hydraulic resistance.

AB - The complexity of open channel confluences stems from flow mixing, secondary circulation, post-confluence flow separation, contraction and backwater effects. These effects in turn result in a large number of parameters required to adequately quantify the junction induced hydraulic resistance and describe mean flow pattern and turbulent flow structures due to flow merging. The recent development in computing power advances the application of 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes to visualize and understand the Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone (CHZ). Nevertheless, 1D approaches remain the mainstay in large drainage network or waterway system modeling considering computational efficiency and data availability. This paper presents (i) a modified 1D nonlinear dynamic model; (ii) a fully 3D non-hydrostatic, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Equations (RANS)-based, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model; (iii) an analysis of changing confluence hydrodynamics and 3D turbulent flow structure under various controls; (iv) a comparison of flow features (i.e. upstream water depths, energy losses and post-confluence contraction) predicted by 1D and 3D models; and (v) parameterization of 3D flow characteristics in 1D modeling through the computation of correction coefficients associated with contraction, energy and momentum. The present comprehensive 3D numerical investigation highlights the driving mechanisms for junction induced energy losses. Moreover, the comparative 1D and 3D study quantifies the deviation of 1D approximations and associated underlying assumptions from the ‘true’ resultant flow field. The study may also shed light on improving the accuracy of the 1D large network modeling through the parameterization of the complex 3D feature of the flow field and correction of interior boundary conditions at junctions of larger angles and/or with substantial lateral inflows. Moreover, the enclosed numerical investigations may enhance the understanding of the primary mechanisms contributing to hydraulic structure induced turbulent flow behavior and increased hydraulic resistance.

KW - Computational fluid dynamics

KW - Energy loss

KW - Hydraulic resistance

KW - Nonlinear mathematical models

KW - Open channel junctions

KW - Turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047642457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047642457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047642457

VL - 117

SP - 120

EP - 139

JO - Advances in Water Resources

JF - Advances in Water Resources

SN - 0309-1708

ER -