TY - JOUR
T1 - Community theories of change
T2 - Linking environmental justice to sustainability through stakeholder perceptions in Milwaukee (WI, USA)
AU - Hornik, Kaitlyn
AU - Cutts, Bethany
AU - Greenlee, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - Environmental justice and sustainability are compatible lenses, yet action toward equity is often missing from urban sustainability initiatives. This study aims to assess the cohesion of these frameworks in practice. To do this, we parse individuals’ theories of change, or how they identify and propose to resolve environmental injustices in the pursuit of sustainability. We posit that these theories of change are comprised of three main components: (1) perceived environmental benefits and burdens; (2) the causal pathways of environmental and social injustice; and (3) visions for positive change. Drawing from 35 stakeholder interviews in Milwaukee (WI, USA) we examine individual and institutional perspectives on environmental and social change and their links to the production of injustice. Our findings reveal that participants do not distinguish between environmental and social injustices. Instead, both social and environmental factors are implicated in injustice. Furthermore, we identify two mental maps for how social and economic change reproduce injustice. These findings suggest the need to reorient how urban injustice is considered and make efforts to acknowledge how a diversity of operational theories of change could either be divisive or could bring environmental justice and sustainability initiatives together.
AB - Environmental justice and sustainability are compatible lenses, yet action toward equity is often missing from urban sustainability initiatives. This study aims to assess the cohesion of these frameworks in practice. To do this, we parse individuals’ theories of change, or how they identify and propose to resolve environmental injustices in the pursuit of sustainability. We posit that these theories of change are comprised of three main components: (1) perceived environmental benefits and burdens; (2) the causal pathways of environmental and social injustice; and (3) visions for positive change. Drawing from 35 stakeholder interviews in Milwaukee (WI, USA) we examine individual and institutional perspectives on environmental and social change and their links to the production of injustice. Our findings reveal that participants do not distinguish between environmental and social injustices. Instead, both social and environmental factors are implicated in injustice. Furthermore, we identify two mental maps for how social and economic change reproduce injustice. These findings suggest the need to reorient how urban injustice is considered and make efforts to acknowledge how a diversity of operational theories of change could either be divisive or could bring environmental justice and sustainability initiatives together.
KW - Interviews
KW - Perceptions
KW - Production of injustice
KW - Socioecological interactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991706377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991706377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph13100979
DO - 10.3390/ijerph13100979
M3 - Article
C2 - 27706068
AN - SCOPUS:84991706377
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 13
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 10
M1 - 979
ER -