TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication behavior of the snow leopard (Panthera uncia)
T2 - understanding marking-behavior patterns to optimize camera-trapping studies
AU - Krofel, Miha
AU - Oliveira, Teresa
AU - Rovero, Francesco
AU - Groff, Claudio
AU - Augugliaro, Claudio
AU - Oberosler, Valentina
AU - Allen, Maximilian L.
N1 - This research was supported by the Panthera Sabin Snow Leopard grants, A.R.C.A. Foundation\u2014Parco Natura Viva, Wildlife Initiative, Irbis Mongolia and the Altai institute for research and conservation. The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency supported MK (grants P4-0059, N1-0163 and J1-50013), the Herbette Foundation from the University of Lausanne supported CA and the Gino Zobele Fund supported VO.
We are grateful to the Ministry of Environment and Tourism of Mongolia for research permits and support, and to C. Janchivlamdan of Wildlife Initiative for logistic support. We thank the following colleagues, field assistants, translators and rangers for invaluable help during the fieldwork: R. Rizzoli, P. Zorer, B. Barsuren, B. Munkh-Erdene, T. Yondonjamts, H. Baymanday, J. Khuantkan, B. Rosenbaum, E. Nurbat, I.E. Monti, and G. Serra. We are grateful to S. Palmarini, R. Rizzoli and M. Mataj for their help with image annotation and to P. Christie and F. Zimmermann for support to the project and lending a portion of camera traps. \u00D6. Johansson, G. Samelius, S. Ciuti and an anonymous reviewer provided numerous useful comments that improved the paper.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Many carnivores rely on marking behavior for intraspecific communication with potential mates and competitors, using scent and visual markings to advertise their use of a territory and allow potential mates to assess their quality. However, obtaining data on communication behaviors of rare and elusive animals can be challenging. To better understand marking behavior of snow leopard (Panthera uncia), we combined camera-trapping, snow-tracking and transect counts of scrapes in the Altai Mountains, Mongolia, and measured frequencies of communication behaviors in both space and time. Next, we explored if this information could be used to improve the efficiency of snow leopard population monitoring through camera-trapping. Using the combination of all three methods, we detected seven communication behaviors. Most visits at marking sites began with sniffing (recorded at 56.4% visits) before progressing to other behaviors. Urine spraying (17.7% of visits) and scraping (16.8%) were exhibited at significantly more visits than other communication behaviors (flehmen, head/body rubbing, fecal deposition, claw marking). According to the snow-tracking data conducted in optimal habitats, scraping was the most frequent marking behavior with 12.8 scrapes/km, followed by urine marking with 10.5 marks/km. Along 32 transects, we recorded a mean of 8.0 cumulative scrapes/km, with highest marking rates recorded in gorges, which we recommend as prime habitats for deploying camera-traps. Finally, our results suggest that the number of scrapes observed at potential camera-trapping sites represents a good predictor of snow leopard visitation rate. Therefore, this parameter can be used when choosing camera-trapping locations to increase the efficiency of monitoring programs.
AB - Many carnivores rely on marking behavior for intraspecific communication with potential mates and competitors, using scent and visual markings to advertise their use of a territory and allow potential mates to assess their quality. However, obtaining data on communication behaviors of rare and elusive animals can be challenging. To better understand marking behavior of snow leopard (Panthera uncia), we combined camera-trapping, snow-tracking and transect counts of scrapes in the Altai Mountains, Mongolia, and measured frequencies of communication behaviors in both space and time. Next, we explored if this information could be used to improve the efficiency of snow leopard population monitoring through camera-trapping. Using the combination of all three methods, we detected seven communication behaviors. Most visits at marking sites began with sniffing (recorded at 56.4% visits) before progressing to other behaviors. Urine spraying (17.7% of visits) and scraping (16.8%) were exhibited at significantly more visits than other communication behaviors (flehmen, head/body rubbing, fecal deposition, claw marking). According to the snow-tracking data conducted in optimal habitats, scraping was the most frequent marking behavior with 12.8 scrapes/km, followed by urine marking with 10.5 marks/km. Along 32 transects, we recorded a mean of 8.0 cumulative scrapes/km, with highest marking rates recorded in gorges, which we recommend as prime habitats for deploying camera-traps. Finally, our results suggest that the number of scrapes observed at potential camera-trapping sites represents a good predictor of snow leopard visitation rate. Therefore, this parameter can be used when choosing camera-trapping locations to increase the efficiency of monitoring programs.
KW - Carnivores
KW - Felids
KW - Intraspecific communication
KW - Mongolia
KW - Monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219691750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219691750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00265-025-03574-8
DO - 10.1007/s00265-025-03574-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219691750
SN - 0340-5443
VL - 79
JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
IS - 3
M1 - 32
ER -