Abstract
Models for the statistics of responses in finite reverberant structures, and in particular, for the variance of the mean square pressure in reverberation rooms, have been studied for decades. It is therefore surprising that a recent communication has claimed that the literature has gotten the simplest of such calculations very wrong. Monsef, Cozza, Rodrigues, Cellard, and Durocher [(2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 2621-2629] have derived a modal-based expression for the relative variance that differs significantly from expressions that have been accepted since 1969. This Comment points out that the Monsef formula is clearly incorrect, and then for the interested reader, points out the subtle place where they made their mistake.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1598-1601 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
| Volume | 137 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "relative variance of the mean squared pressure in multimode media: Rehabilitating former approaches" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 2621-2629 (2014)]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS