Coming Out and Getting Back In: Relationship Cycling and Distress in Same- and Different-Sex Relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine the role of on–off relationship cycling in psychological distress for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships. Background: Relationship processes have a robust effect on individual well-being, and dissolution is associated with psychological distress that is normative and typically short-lived. A prolonged history of terminating a relationship and then reconciling (i.e., on–off cycling), however, may facilitate more pervasive symptomology. Moreover, researchers have indicated that instability is similar for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships, but cycling in same-sex relationships has yet to be studied despite existing disparities for sexual minorities. Method: Data from 545 individuals in same-sex (n = 279) and different-sex (n = 266) relationships were used to assess the association between on–off cycling and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Results: The occurrence of cycling was similar across relationship types, but a greater frequency emerged in male–male relationships compared with female–female and different-sex relationships. Regardless of relationship type, we found a positive association between relationship cycling and distress while controlling for known correlates of mental health. Conclusion: Patterns of breakup and renewal were linked to increased symptoms of psychological distress, indicating the accumulation of relationship transitions can create added turmoil for individuals. Implications: Due to the potential distress associated with this relational pattern, practitioners should assess for on–off instability. We also provide suggestions for encouraging individuals in distressed on–off relationships to make informed decisions about stabilizing or safely terminating their partnerships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-538
Number of pages16
JournalFamily Relations
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Psychology
Mental Health
Anxiety
well-being
mental health
Research Personnel
minority
Depression
anxiety
history
Sexual Minorities

Keywords

  • Couple relationships
  • mental health
  • relationship cycling
  • relationship instability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Coming Out and Getting Back In : Relationship Cycling and Distress in Same- and Different-Sex Relationships. / Monk, J. Kale; Ogolsky, Brian G.; Oswald, Ramona F.

In: Family Relations, Vol. 67, No. 4, 10.2018, p. 523-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c009283e335446cbb1a8c9286e3d6d34,
title = "Coming Out and Getting Back In: Relationship Cycling and Distress in Same- and Different-Sex Relationships",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the role of on–off relationship cycling in psychological distress for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships. Background: Relationship processes have a robust effect on individual well-being, and dissolution is associated with psychological distress that is normative and typically short-lived. A prolonged history of terminating a relationship and then reconciling (i.e., on–off cycling), however, may facilitate more pervasive symptomology. Moreover, researchers have indicated that instability is similar for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships, but cycling in same-sex relationships has yet to be studied despite existing disparities for sexual minorities. Method: Data from 545 individuals in same-sex (n = 279) and different-sex (n = 266) relationships were used to assess the association between on–off cycling and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Results: The occurrence of cycling was similar across relationship types, but a greater frequency emerged in male–male relationships compared with female–female and different-sex relationships. Regardless of relationship type, we found a positive association between relationship cycling and distress while controlling for known correlates of mental health. Conclusion: Patterns of breakup and renewal were linked to increased symptoms of psychological distress, indicating the accumulation of relationship transitions can create added turmoil for individuals. Implications: Due to the potential distress associated with this relational pattern, practitioners should assess for on–off instability. We also provide suggestions for encouraging individuals in distressed on–off relationships to make informed decisions about stabilizing or safely terminating their partnerships.",
keywords = "Couple relationships, mental health, relationship cycling, relationship instability",
author = "Monk, {J. Kale} and Ogolsky, {Brian G.} and Oswald, {Ramona F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/fare.12336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "523--538",
journal = "Family Relations",
issn = "0197-6664",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coming Out and Getting Back In

T2 - Relationship Cycling and Distress in Same- and Different-Sex Relationships

AU - Monk, J. Kale

AU - Ogolsky, Brian G.

AU - Oswald, Ramona F.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Objective: To examine the role of on–off relationship cycling in psychological distress for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships. Background: Relationship processes have a robust effect on individual well-being, and dissolution is associated with psychological distress that is normative and typically short-lived. A prolonged history of terminating a relationship and then reconciling (i.e., on–off cycling), however, may facilitate more pervasive symptomology. Moreover, researchers have indicated that instability is similar for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships, but cycling in same-sex relationships has yet to be studied despite existing disparities for sexual minorities. Method: Data from 545 individuals in same-sex (n = 279) and different-sex (n = 266) relationships were used to assess the association between on–off cycling and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Results: The occurrence of cycling was similar across relationship types, but a greater frequency emerged in male–male relationships compared with female–female and different-sex relationships. Regardless of relationship type, we found a positive association between relationship cycling and distress while controlling for known correlates of mental health. Conclusion: Patterns of breakup and renewal were linked to increased symptoms of psychological distress, indicating the accumulation of relationship transitions can create added turmoil for individuals. Implications: Due to the potential distress associated with this relational pattern, practitioners should assess for on–off instability. We also provide suggestions for encouraging individuals in distressed on–off relationships to make informed decisions about stabilizing or safely terminating their partnerships.

AB - Objective: To examine the role of on–off relationship cycling in psychological distress for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships. Background: Relationship processes have a robust effect on individual well-being, and dissolution is associated with psychological distress that is normative and typically short-lived. A prolonged history of terminating a relationship and then reconciling (i.e., on–off cycling), however, may facilitate more pervasive symptomology. Moreover, researchers have indicated that instability is similar for individuals in same- and different-sex relationships, but cycling in same-sex relationships has yet to be studied despite existing disparities for sexual minorities. Method: Data from 545 individuals in same-sex (n = 279) and different-sex (n = 266) relationships were used to assess the association between on–off cycling and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Results: The occurrence of cycling was similar across relationship types, but a greater frequency emerged in male–male relationships compared with female–female and different-sex relationships. Regardless of relationship type, we found a positive association between relationship cycling and distress while controlling for known correlates of mental health. Conclusion: Patterns of breakup and renewal were linked to increased symptoms of psychological distress, indicating the accumulation of relationship transitions can create added turmoil for individuals. Implications: Due to the potential distress associated with this relational pattern, practitioners should assess for on–off instability. We also provide suggestions for encouraging individuals in distressed on–off relationships to make informed decisions about stabilizing or safely terminating their partnerships.

KW - Couple relationships

KW - mental health

KW - relationship cycling

KW - relationship instability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051101982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051101982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/fare.12336

DO - 10.1111/fare.12336

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051101982

VL - 67

SP - 523

EP - 538

JO - Family Relations

JF - Family Relations

SN - 0197-6664

IS - 4

ER -