TY - JOUR
T1 - Colonization of germ-free piglets with commensal lactobacillus amylovorus, lactobacillus mucosae, and probiotic e. Coli nissle 1917 and their interference with salmonella typhimurium
AU - Splichal, Igor
AU - Donovan, Sharon M.
AU - Splichalova, Zdislava
AU - Bunesova, Vera Neuzil
AU - Vlkova, Eva
AU - Jenistova, Vera
AU - Killer, Jiri
AU - Svejstil, Roman
AU - Skrivanova, Eva
AU - Splichalova, Alla
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was funded from the grant 13-08803S of the Czech Science Foundation and the Institutional Research concept RVO 61388971 of the Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. V.J. was supported by the grant GAUK 1368217 of the Grant Agency of the Charles University. S.M.D. was supported by NIH grant RO1 DK107561.
Funding Information:
This work was funded from the grant 13-08803S of the Czech Science Foundation and the Institutional Research concept RVO 61388971 of the Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. V.J. was supported by the grant GAUK 1368217 of the Grant Agency of the Charles University. S.M.D. was supported by NIH grant RO1 DK107561.. We are grateful to Jana Machova, Hana Sychrovska, and Jarmila Jarkovska for animal care, microbiological work, and a procession of samples. The special thanks is given to professor Vojtech Rada from the University of Life Sciences in Prague for fruitful discussions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Non-typhoid Salmonellae are worldwide spread food-borne pathogens that cause diarrhea in humans and animals. Their multi-drug resistances require alternative ways to combat this enteric pathogen. Mono-colonization of a gnotobiotic piglet gastrointestinal tract with commensal lactobacilli Lactobacillus amylovorus and Lactobacillus mucosae and with probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 and their interference with S. Typhimurium infection was compared. The impact of bacteria and possible protection against infection with Salmonella were evaluated by clinical signs, bacterial translocation, intestinal histology, mRNA expression of villin, claudin-1, claudin-2, and occludin in the ileum and colon, and local intestinal and systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-10. Both lactobacilli colonized the gastrointestinal tract in approximately 100× lower density compare to E. coli Nissle and S. Typhimurium. Neither L. amylovorus nor L. mucosae suppressed the inflammatory reaction caused by the 24 h infection with S. Typhimurium. In contrast, probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 was able to suppress clinical signs, histopathological changes, the transcriptions of the proteins, and the inductions of the inflammatory cytokines. Future studies are needed to determine whether prebiotic support of the growth of lactobacilli and multistrain lactobacilli inoculum could show higher protective effects.
AB - Non-typhoid Salmonellae are worldwide spread food-borne pathogens that cause diarrhea in humans and animals. Their multi-drug resistances require alternative ways to combat this enteric pathogen. Mono-colonization of a gnotobiotic piglet gastrointestinal tract with commensal lactobacilli Lactobacillus amylovorus and Lactobacillus mucosae and with probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 and their interference with S. Typhimurium infection was compared. The impact of bacteria and possible protection against infection with Salmonella were evaluated by clinical signs, bacterial translocation, intestinal histology, mRNA expression of villin, claudin-1, claudin-2, and occludin in the ileum and colon, and local intestinal and systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-10. Both lactobacilli colonized the gastrointestinal tract in approximately 100× lower density compare to E. coli Nissle and S. Typhimurium. Neither L. amylovorus nor L. mucosae suppressed the inflammatory reaction caused by the 24 h infection with S. Typhimurium. In contrast, probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 was able to suppress clinical signs, histopathological changes, the transcriptions of the proteins, and the inductions of the inflammatory cytokines. Future studies are needed to determine whether prebiotic support of the growth of lactobacilli and multistrain lactobacilli inoculum could show higher protective effects.
KW - Cytokine
KW - E. Coli Nissle 1917
KW - Food-borne pathogen
KW - Gnotobiotic piglet
KW - Intestine
KW - Lactobacillus amylovorus
KW - Lactobacillus mucosae
KW - Salmonella Typhimurium
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074264702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074264702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/microorganisms7080273
DO - 10.3390/microorganisms7080273
M3 - Article
C2 - 31434337
AN - SCOPUS:85074264702
SN - 2076-2607
VL - 7
JO - Microorganisms
JF - Microorganisms
IS - 8
M1 - 273
ER -