TY - JOUR
T1 - College and Career Readiness and the Every Student Succeeds Act
AU - Malin, Joel R.
AU - Bragg, Debra
AU - Hackmann, Donald G.
N1 - Funding Information:
With the 2010 legislation came the selection of seven new community college and high school partners for program implementation grants, with a wider array of strategies possible than the 2007 bill. These sites were further supported by Illinois’ selection in 2011 as a recipient of a federal Race to the Top (RttT) grant (State of Illinois, 2011). Under RttT, the state continued the seven grants begun in 2010 and expanded the CCR program to support participating high schools as they implemented STEM programs of study in Grades 9-14, drawing on the statewide longitudinal data system that was designed to facilitate data sharing across levels of the education system. These grants extended remedial education models that were pilot tested in the early years of CCR grant funding, including experimentation with high school-to-college bridge programs that offered accelerated remedial mathematics education (Zamani-Gallaher, Lang, Graham, & Baber, 2016). The three state agencies for education (ISBE, ICCB, Illinois Board of Higher Education), and three other state agencies also signed an intergovernmental agreement to establish the Illinois Pathways Interagency Committee to provide oversight to high school-to-college transition projects.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Purpose: This study addressed the current policy push to improve students’ college and career readiness (CCR) as manifested within the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and examined CCR policy in the state of Illinois as a case study, noting ways in which provisions for CCR programs prepare all students, including those historically underserved by higher education, to be prepared for education and employment post–high school. Research Methods: A critical analytic approach was undertaken, foregrounding equity. We conducted thematic content analysis of ESSA and Illinois policy, employing a CCR accountability paradigm. Findings: CCR-related content was contained throughout ESSA. Although content varied, themes were identified. Dual enrollment provisions were prominent in ESSA but not the Illinois’ CCR laws; however, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics was emphasized in both. ESSA introduced but did not fully clarify what constitutes a well-rounded education and did not identify particular reporting and accountability provisions, whereas two Illinois’ CCR bills focused on remedial education and the third evidenced a more comprehensive and integrated CCR approach. These findings suggest distinct federal and Illinois’ CCR visions. A more systematic equity focus was evident within ESSA. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: ESSA provisions providing new flexibilities to states portend wide variation in emphasis toward, and accountability for, long-standing equity issues. District officials will also likely have substantial flexibility in their administration, design, and implementation of ESSA-funded CCR programming, which may affect educational equity in ways that advantage and disadvantage. We thus provide several cautions and recommendations.
AB - Purpose: This study addressed the current policy push to improve students’ college and career readiness (CCR) as manifested within the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and examined CCR policy in the state of Illinois as a case study, noting ways in which provisions for CCR programs prepare all students, including those historically underserved by higher education, to be prepared for education and employment post–high school. Research Methods: A critical analytic approach was undertaken, foregrounding equity. We conducted thematic content analysis of ESSA and Illinois policy, employing a CCR accountability paradigm. Findings: CCR-related content was contained throughout ESSA. Although content varied, themes were identified. Dual enrollment provisions were prominent in ESSA but not the Illinois’ CCR laws; however, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics was emphasized in both. ESSA introduced but did not fully clarify what constitutes a well-rounded education and did not identify particular reporting and accountability provisions, whereas two Illinois’ CCR bills focused on remedial education and the third evidenced a more comprehensive and integrated CCR approach. These findings suggest distinct federal and Illinois’ CCR visions. A more systematic equity focus was evident within ESSA. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: ESSA provisions providing new flexibilities to states portend wide variation in emphasis toward, and accountability for, long-standing equity issues. District officials will also likely have substantial flexibility in their administration, design, and implementation of ESSA-funded CCR programming, which may affect educational equity in ways that advantage and disadvantage. We thus provide several cautions and recommendations.
KW - Every Student Succeeds Act
KW - career readiness
KW - college readiness
KW - education policy
KW - educational equity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027518509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027518509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0013161X17714845
DO - 10.1177/0013161X17714845
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027518509
SN - 0013-161X
VL - 53
SP - 809
EP - 838
JO - Educational Administration Quarterly
JF - Educational Administration Quarterly
IS - 5
ER -