TY - JOUR
T1 - Collective attention and relational overload
T2 - A theory of transactive control in high-permeability intraorganizational environments
AU - Bernstein, Ethan S.
AU - Gupta, Pranav
AU - Mortensen, Mark
AU - Leonardi, Paul M.
N1 - We thank Anita Woolley, Willie Ocasio, Jenny Chatman, John Joseph, Joshua Margolis, and participants in the HBS OB Junior Faculty Workshop for extensive and meaningful feedback\u2014and encouragement\u2014at various stages in our development of this paper. Editor Jack Goncalo and our anonymous reviewers pushed our thinking with highly developmental, insightful, supportive, and sometimes provocative comments throughout the review process. This paper stemmed from three doctoral dissertations, and we thank our committees for their supervision, mentorship, inspiration, and confidence in this work. We also thank our families for their unwavering support and for putting up with us through this process. We gratefully acknowledge the Division of Research at the Harvard Business school and the Tepper School of Business at CMU for providing financial support for this research.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - As rapid organizational and technological change makes boundaries within workplaces more permeable, employees are gaining unprecedented access to new people and information. This both increases opportunities for collaboration and heightens the risk of attention overload. While scholars have investigated overload with respect to “what” employees attend to, little research has examined the challenges concerning “whom” to attend to, resulting in ambiguity that can undermine collaborative relationships. In this paper, we integrate and advance insights from organizational control and selective-attention research, building on those macro- and micro-level theories to better conceptualize collective attention when the potential target is a colleague (human) rather than information (nonhuman)—which we conceptualize as relational attention, i.e., attention-to-whom. Further, we propose a separate, meso-level theory of transactive control of relational attention, building on concepts of transactive behavior from other fields. By exploring how such transactive control works, we begin to define the conditions organizations need to cultivate—regarding mutually transparent availability, synchronous attentional allocation, and reciprocal attentional allocation—to reduce relational overload without sacrificing productive work relationships or other benefits of more permeable internal boundaries. In addition to shedding light on underexamined attention problems in the workplace, this model contributes to future research by forging multi-level connections between individual meta-attention, transactive control over relational attention, and more traditional forms of organizational control.
AB - As rapid organizational and technological change makes boundaries within workplaces more permeable, employees are gaining unprecedented access to new people and information. This both increases opportunities for collaboration and heightens the risk of attention overload. While scholars have investigated overload with respect to “what” employees attend to, little research has examined the challenges concerning “whom” to attend to, resulting in ambiguity that can undermine collaborative relationships. In this paper, we integrate and advance insights from organizational control and selective-attention research, building on those macro- and micro-level theories to better conceptualize collective attention when the potential target is a colleague (human) rather than information (nonhuman)—which we conceptualize as relational attention, i.e., attention-to-whom. Further, we propose a separate, meso-level theory of transactive control of relational attention, building on concepts of transactive behavior from other fields. By exploring how such transactive control works, we begin to define the conditions organizations need to cultivate—regarding mutually transparent availability, synchronous attentional allocation, and reciprocal attentional allocation—to reduce relational overload without sacrificing productive work relationships or other benefits of more permeable internal boundaries. In addition to shedding light on underexamined attention problems in the workplace, this model contributes to future research by forging multi-level connections between individual meta-attention, transactive control over relational attention, and more traditional forms of organizational control.
KW - Attention
KW - Boundaries
KW - Collaboration
KW - Group structure
KW - Organization structure
KW - Organizational control
KW - Teams
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209595162&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85209595162&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.riob.2024.100209
DO - 10.1016/j.riob.2024.100209
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209595162
SN - 0191-3085
VL - 44
JO - Research in Organizational Behavior
JF - Research in Organizational Behavior
M1 - 100209
ER -