TY - JOUR
T1 - Codes of Conduct at Political Science Conferences
T2 - Prevalence and Content
AU - Lu, Lucie
AU - Williams, Nora Webb
N1 - The authors thank Foxx et al.(2019), especially Evelyn Webb Williams, for inspiring this article.We thank participants at our 2023 Midwest Political Science Association panel and the Spring 2023 Department of Political Science Student-Faculty Seminar at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for their helpful comments and suggestions.Hyein Ko provided detailed comments on the manuscript, for which we are grateful.Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their excellent recommendations on how to improve the article.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Academic conferences are important institutions for promoting new research and facilitating conversations about the field.As a venue for knowledge exchange, professional development, and networking, conferences ideally promote positive environments that make scholars from underrepresented groups feel welcome.Yet, negative experiences at conferences are well documented.Codes of conduct have been promoted as tools to reduce harassment and discrimination.This article examines the prevalence and content of codes at US-based political science conferences and workshops.More specifically, we analyze whether and how codes address issues of sexual misconduct and identity-based discrimination.We find that 19% of 177 surveyed conferences have a code of conduct.Conferences that are older and larger are more likely to have codes, as are conferences that are run by organizations with permanent staff and relevant committees.We argue that effective conference codes must contain definitions, reporting channels, and enforcement procedures.Many of the analyzed codes did not explicitly define prohibited behaviors, specify mechanisms to report code violations, or describe consequences for misconduct.
AB - Academic conferences are important institutions for promoting new research and facilitating conversations about the field.As a venue for knowledge exchange, professional development, and networking, conferences ideally promote positive environments that make scholars from underrepresented groups feel welcome.Yet, negative experiences at conferences are well documented.Codes of conduct have been promoted as tools to reduce harassment and discrimination.This article examines the prevalence and content of codes at US-based political science conferences and workshops.More specifically, we analyze whether and how codes address issues of sexual misconduct and identity-based discrimination.We find that 19% of 177 surveyed conferences have a code of conduct.Conferences that are older and larger are more likely to have codes, as are conferences that are run by organizations with permanent staff and relevant committees.We argue that effective conference codes must contain definitions, reporting channels, and enforcement procedures.Many of the analyzed codes did not explicitly define prohibited behaviors, specify mechanisms to report code violations, or describe consequences for misconduct.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194075267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194075267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1049096524000179
DO - 10.1017/S1049096524000179
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194075267
SN - 1049-0965
VL - 57
SP - 563
EP - 570
JO - PS - Political Science and Politics
JF - PS - Political Science and Politics
IS - 4
ER -