Abstract

Despite its failure to predict variation in secondary chemistry for many metabolites and taxa, the Carbon/Nutrient Balance (CNB) hypothesis continues to be invoked with regularity. According to Lerdau and Coley (2002), the value of the hypothesis is that it explains phytochemical phenotypic plasticity outside of an evolutionary context. We contend that the CNB hypothesis impedes a more comprehensive understanding of plant biology and that an approach divorcing plant chemistry from function is inherently limited in its ability to predict responses of plants to the environmental conditions in which they have evolved. Although it is possible for a mechanistically flawed hypothesis to predict phenomena, such hypotheses almost always suffer a lack of generality. Lerdau and Coley argue that the limitations of the CNB model are its strengths, not its weaknesses, and set forth refinements that, in essence, further limit its applicability. We address these refinements and explore alternative adaptive explanations for adjustments of secondary metabolism in relation to resource availability and environmental variation. In view of its flawed nature and the existence of alternative approaches, CNB no longer warrants consideration as a viable hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-546
Number of pages7
JournalOikos
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2002

Fingerprint

nutrient balance
carbon
phytochemistry
plant biochemistry
plant biology
phenotypic plasticity
resource availability
phytopharmaceuticals
plant response
metabolite
chemistry
metabolism
environmental conditions
metabolites
environmental factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

CNB : Requiescat in pace? / Nitao, J. K.; Zangerl, A. R.; Berenbaum, M. R.; Hamilton, J. G.; DeLucia, E. H.

In: Oikos, Vol. 98, No. 3, 01.09.2002, p. 540-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Nitao, JK, Zangerl, AR, Berenbaum, MR, Hamilton, JG & DeLucia, EH 2002, 'CNB: Requiescat in pace?', Oikos, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 540-546. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980320.x
Nitao, J. K. ; Zangerl, A. R. ; Berenbaum, M. R. ; Hamilton, J. G. ; DeLucia, E. H. / CNB : Requiescat in pace?. In: Oikos. 2002 ; Vol. 98, No. 3. pp. 540-546.
@article{37d6e5081f7445e082bfa64c1a535393,
title = "CNB: Requiescat in pace?",
abstract = "Despite its failure to predict variation in secondary chemistry for many metabolites and taxa, the Carbon/Nutrient Balance (CNB) hypothesis continues to be invoked with regularity. According to Lerdau and Coley (2002), the value of the hypothesis is that it explains phytochemical phenotypic plasticity outside of an evolutionary context. We contend that the CNB hypothesis impedes a more comprehensive understanding of plant biology and that an approach divorcing plant chemistry from function is inherently limited in its ability to predict responses of plants to the environmental conditions in which they have evolved. Although it is possible for a mechanistically flawed hypothesis to predict phenomena, such hypotheses almost always suffer a lack of generality. Lerdau and Coley argue that the limitations of the CNB model are its strengths, not its weaknesses, and set forth refinements that, in essence, further limit its applicability. We address these refinements and explore alternative adaptive explanations for adjustments of secondary metabolism in relation to resource availability and environmental variation. In view of its flawed nature and the existence of alternative approaches, CNB no longer warrants consideration as a viable hypothesis.",
author = "Nitao, {J. K.} and Zangerl, {A. R.} and Berenbaum, {M. R.} and Hamilton, {J. G.} and DeLucia, {E. H.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980320.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "540--546",
journal = "Oikos",
issn = "0030-1299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CNB

T2 - Requiescat in pace?

AU - Nitao, J. K.

AU - Zangerl, A. R.

AU - Berenbaum, M. R.

AU - Hamilton, J. G.

AU - DeLucia, E. H.

PY - 2002/9/1

Y1 - 2002/9/1

N2 - Despite its failure to predict variation in secondary chemistry for many metabolites and taxa, the Carbon/Nutrient Balance (CNB) hypothesis continues to be invoked with regularity. According to Lerdau and Coley (2002), the value of the hypothesis is that it explains phytochemical phenotypic plasticity outside of an evolutionary context. We contend that the CNB hypothesis impedes a more comprehensive understanding of plant biology and that an approach divorcing plant chemistry from function is inherently limited in its ability to predict responses of plants to the environmental conditions in which they have evolved. Although it is possible for a mechanistically flawed hypothesis to predict phenomena, such hypotheses almost always suffer a lack of generality. Lerdau and Coley argue that the limitations of the CNB model are its strengths, not its weaknesses, and set forth refinements that, in essence, further limit its applicability. We address these refinements and explore alternative adaptive explanations for adjustments of secondary metabolism in relation to resource availability and environmental variation. In view of its flawed nature and the existence of alternative approaches, CNB no longer warrants consideration as a viable hypothesis.

AB - Despite its failure to predict variation in secondary chemistry for many metabolites and taxa, the Carbon/Nutrient Balance (CNB) hypothesis continues to be invoked with regularity. According to Lerdau and Coley (2002), the value of the hypothesis is that it explains phytochemical phenotypic plasticity outside of an evolutionary context. We contend that the CNB hypothesis impedes a more comprehensive understanding of plant biology and that an approach divorcing plant chemistry from function is inherently limited in its ability to predict responses of plants to the environmental conditions in which they have evolved. Although it is possible for a mechanistically flawed hypothesis to predict phenomena, such hypotheses almost always suffer a lack of generality. Lerdau and Coley argue that the limitations of the CNB model are its strengths, not its weaknesses, and set forth refinements that, in essence, further limit its applicability. We address these refinements and explore alternative adaptive explanations for adjustments of secondary metabolism in relation to resource availability and environmental variation. In view of its flawed nature and the existence of alternative approaches, CNB no longer warrants consideration as a viable hypothesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036746254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036746254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980320.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980320.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0036746254

VL - 98

SP - 540

EP - 546

JO - Oikos

JF - Oikos

SN - 0030-1299

IS - 3

ER -