Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors

Lauren E. Linderman, B F Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Wireless smart sensors, which have become popular for monitoring applications, are an attractive option for implementing structural control systems, due to their onboard sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. However, wireless smart sensors pose inherent challenges for control, including delays from communication, acquisition hardware, and processing time. Previous research in wireless control, which focused on semi-active systems, has found that sampling rate along with time delays can significantly impact control performance. However, because semi-active systems are guaranteed stable, these issues are typically neglected in the control design. This work achieves active control with smart sensors in an experimental setting. Because active systems are not inherently stable, all the elements of the control loop must be addressed, including data acquisition hardware, processing performance, and control design at slow sampling rates. The sensing hardware is shown to have a significant impact on the control design and performance. Ultimately, the smart sensor active control system achieves comparable performance to the traditional tethered system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1147-1167
Number of pages21
JournalSmart Structures and Systems
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Smart sensors
Hardware
Processing
Sampling
Control systems
Communication
Data acquisition
Time delay
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Discrete-time control design
  • Smart sensors
  • Structural control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors. / Linderman, Lauren E.; Spencer, B F.

In: Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 16, No. 6, 12.2015, p. 1147-1167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linderman, Lauren E. ; Spencer, B F. / Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors. In: Smart Structures and Systems. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 1147-1167.
@article{791046bdebd642d892499a8b7c125be0,
title = "Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors",
abstract = "Wireless smart sensors, which have become popular for monitoring applications, are an attractive option for implementing structural control systems, due to their onboard sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. However, wireless smart sensors pose inherent challenges for control, including delays from communication, acquisition hardware, and processing time. Previous research in wireless control, which focused on semi-active systems, has found that sampling rate along with time delays can significantly impact control performance. However, because semi-active systems are guaranteed stable, these issues are typically neglected in the control design. This work achieves active control with smart sensors in an experimental setting. Because active systems are not inherently stable, all the elements of the control loop must be addressed, including data acquisition hardware, processing performance, and control design at slow sampling rates. The sensing hardware is shown to have a significant impact on the control design and performance. Ultimately, the smart sensor active control system achieves comparable performance to the traditional tethered system.",
keywords = "Discrete-time control design, Smart sensors, Structural control",
author = "Linderman, {Lauren E.} and Spencer, {B F}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1147--1167",
journal = "Smart Structures and Systems",
issn = "1738-1584",
publisher = "Techno Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors

AU - Linderman, Lauren E.

AU - Spencer, B F

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Wireless smart sensors, which have become popular for monitoring applications, are an attractive option for implementing structural control systems, due to their onboard sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. However, wireless smart sensors pose inherent challenges for control, including delays from communication, acquisition hardware, and processing time. Previous research in wireless control, which focused on semi-active systems, has found that sampling rate along with time delays can significantly impact control performance. However, because semi-active systems are guaranteed stable, these issues are typically neglected in the control design. This work achieves active control with smart sensors in an experimental setting. Because active systems are not inherently stable, all the elements of the control loop must be addressed, including data acquisition hardware, processing performance, and control design at slow sampling rates. The sensing hardware is shown to have a significant impact on the control design and performance. Ultimately, the smart sensor active control system achieves comparable performance to the traditional tethered system.

AB - Wireless smart sensors, which have become popular for monitoring applications, are an attractive option for implementing structural control systems, due to their onboard sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. However, wireless smart sensors pose inherent challenges for control, including delays from communication, acquisition hardware, and processing time. Previous research in wireless control, which focused on semi-active systems, has found that sampling rate along with time delays can significantly impact control performance. However, because semi-active systems are guaranteed stable, these issues are typically neglected in the control design. This work achieves active control with smart sensors in an experimental setting. Because active systems are not inherently stable, all the elements of the control loop must be addressed, including data acquisition hardware, processing performance, and control design at slow sampling rates. The sensing hardware is shown to have a significant impact on the control design and performance. Ultimately, the smart sensor active control system achieves comparable performance to the traditional tethered system.

KW - Discrete-time control design

KW - Smart sensors

KW - Structural control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953389147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953389147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1147

DO - 10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1147

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953389147

VL - 16

SP - 1147

EP - 1167

JO - Smart Structures and Systems

JF - Smart Structures and Systems

SN - 1738-1584

IS - 6

ER -