TY - GEN
T1 - Cleantax
T2 - Benchmarking of Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning Systems - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium
AU - Thau, David
AU - Bowers, Shawn
AU - Ludäscher, Bertram
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The CLEANTAX framework relates (aligns) taxonomies (inclusion hierarchies) to one another using relations drawn from the RCC-5 algebra. The taxonomies, represented as par-tial orders with additional constraints, can frequently (but not always) be represented with RCC-5 relations as well. Given two aligned taxonomies, LEANTAX can infer new rela tions (articulations) between their concepts, detect inconsis tentalignments, and merge taxonomies. Inference and incon sistency detection can be performed by a variety of reasoners, and in cases where all relations can be described by the RCC 5 algebra, qualitative spatial reasoners may be applied. When inferring new articulations between taxonomies, CLEANTAx often poses many highly related queries of the nature "given what we know about the relations between two taxonomies, T1, and T2, what do we know about the relationship between concept A in T1, and concept B in T2?" This context of posing many (millions) of simple, but highly related queries moti vates the need for qualitative reasoning systems that can per form batch jobs and leverage reasoning performed in the past to optimize answering queries about similar situations. This paper describes the CLEANTAX framework and argues for the development of benchmarks that take throughput into consideration, as well as single-query response time.
AB - The CLEANTAX framework relates (aligns) taxonomies (inclusion hierarchies) to one another using relations drawn from the RCC-5 algebra. The taxonomies, represented as par-tial orders with additional constraints, can frequently (but not always) be represented with RCC-5 relations as well. Given two aligned taxonomies, LEANTAX can infer new rela tions (articulations) between their concepts, detect inconsis tentalignments, and merge taxonomies. Inference and incon sistency detection can be performed by a variety of reasoners, and in cases where all relations can be described by the RCC 5 algebra, qualitative spatial reasoners may be applied. When inferring new articulations between taxonomies, CLEANTAx often poses many highly related queries of the nature "given what we know about the relations between two taxonomies, T1, and T2, what do we know about the relationship between concept A in T1, and concept B in T2?" This context of posing many (millions) of simple, but highly related queries moti vates the need for qualitative reasoning systems that can per form batch jobs and leverage reasoning performed in the past to optimize answering queries about similar situations. This paper describes the CLEANTAX framework and argues for the development of benchmarks that take throughput into consideration, as well as single-query response time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350441862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350441862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70350441862
SN - 9781577354093
T3 - AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report
SP - 49
EP - 50
BT - Benchmarking of Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning Systems - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium
Y2 - 23 March 2009 through 25 March 2009
ER -