Civil Rights, Commerce, and US Colonialism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay examines how the courts intensified Indigenous dispossession and legally disempowered African Americans through misinterpretations of the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. These misinterpretations support corporate interests, US sovereignty, and white supremacy while linking Congress’s plenary power over Indigenous nations to people of color’s civil rights. Hence, the civil rights of African Americans and other people of color are, in part, legally ineffectual promises contingent on expanding US sovereignty and racial capitalism.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63–82
JournalSocial Text
Volume36
Issue number2 (135)
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

people of color
civil rights
colonial age
commerce
sovereignty
capitalist society
constitution
American

Keywords

  • African Americans
  • indigeneity
  • civil rights
  • Commerce Clause
  • economies of dispossession

Cite this

Civil Rights, Commerce, and US Colonialism. / Cacho, Lisa Marie.

In: Social Text, Vol. 36, No. 2 (135), 06.2018, p. 63–82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cacho, Lisa Marie. / Civil Rights, Commerce, and US Colonialism. In: Social Text. 2018 ; Vol. 36, No. 2 (135). pp. 63–82.
@article{4ad78265eae7417589ff434eabf9848e,
title = "Civil Rights, Commerce, and US Colonialism",
abstract = "This essay examines how the courts intensified Indigenous dispossession and legally disempowered African Americans through misinterpretations of the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. These misinterpretations support corporate interests, US sovereignty, and white supremacy while linking Congress’s plenary power over Indigenous nations to people of color’s civil rights. Hence, the civil rights of African Americans and other people of color are, in part, legally ineffectual promises contingent on expanding US sovereignty and racial capitalism.",
keywords = "African Americans, indigeneity, civil rights, Commerce Clause, economies of dispossession",
author = "Cacho, {Lisa Marie}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1215/01642472-4362361",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "63–82",
journal = "Social Text",
issn = "0164-2472",
number = "2 (135)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civil Rights, Commerce, and US Colonialism

AU - Cacho, Lisa Marie

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - This essay examines how the courts intensified Indigenous dispossession and legally disempowered African Americans through misinterpretations of the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. These misinterpretations support corporate interests, US sovereignty, and white supremacy while linking Congress’s plenary power over Indigenous nations to people of color’s civil rights. Hence, the civil rights of African Americans and other people of color are, in part, legally ineffectual promises contingent on expanding US sovereignty and racial capitalism.

AB - This essay examines how the courts intensified Indigenous dispossession and legally disempowered African Americans through misinterpretations of the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. These misinterpretations support corporate interests, US sovereignty, and white supremacy while linking Congress’s plenary power over Indigenous nations to people of color’s civil rights. Hence, the civil rights of African Americans and other people of color are, in part, legally ineffectual promises contingent on expanding US sovereignty and racial capitalism.

KW - African Americans

KW - indigeneity

KW - civil rights

KW - Commerce Clause

KW - economies of dispossession

U2 - 10.1215/01642472-4362361

DO - 10.1215/01642472-4362361

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 63

EP - 82

JO - Social Text

JF - Social Text

SN - 0164-2472

IS - 2 (135)

ER -