TY - JOUR
T1 - China and International Order
T2 - The Limits of Integration
AU - Dai, Xinyuan
AU - Renn, Duu
N1 - Funding Information:
Parts of the research contained in this paper have been presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association of Chinese Political Studies, June 2015, in Beijing, China, and the University of Chicago – Peking University Summer Institute on International Relations, August 2015, in Beijing, China. We thank Professors Wei Liang, Andrew Moravscsik, Robert Gulotty and other conference participants for their helpful comments, as well as Colby Hess, Christopher Long, and Evangeline Reynolds for their excellent work on the MAP dataset construction. Xinyuan Dai would like to acknowledge the support from the Research Board, as well as both the Political Science Department and the Law School, at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - What does the rise of China mean for the international order, especially the liberal institutional order? Despite of the enormous scholarly attention paid to this important question, there has been no systematic effort to map out this order and how China relates to it. We examine the international institutional order using an original dataset, the Multilateral Agreements and Protocols (MAP). We further develop a new metric of a country’s embeddedness in the international institutional order. Our analysis leads us to reconsider prominent conjectures about China’s evolving relationship to the current international liberal order. We find that, relative to the global average, China is less inclined towards deep commitment to the current international institutional order. Indeed, China’s wariness about this order seems in contrast to the growing global appetite for deep commitment. Furthermore, China seems less embedded in some issue areas that are central to the international liberal order. These findings suggest that the integration of China into the current Western liberal order may not be as automatic as some have suggested and reinforce concerns over the future of global governance.
AB - What does the rise of China mean for the international order, especially the liberal institutional order? Despite of the enormous scholarly attention paid to this important question, there has been no systematic effort to map out this order and how China relates to it. We examine the international institutional order using an original dataset, the Multilateral Agreements and Protocols (MAP). We further develop a new metric of a country’s embeddedness in the international institutional order. Our analysis leads us to reconsider prominent conjectures about China’s evolving relationship to the current international liberal order. We find that, relative to the global average, China is less inclined towards deep commitment to the current international institutional order. Indeed, China’s wariness about this order seems in contrast to the growing global appetite for deep commitment. Furthermore, China seems less embedded in some issue areas that are central to the international liberal order. These findings suggest that the integration of China into the current Western liberal order may not be as automatic as some have suggested and reinforce concerns over the future of global governance.
KW - Agreements
KW - China
KW - International Institutions
KW - International Order
KW - Protocols
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965020716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965020716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11366-016-9403-5
DO - 10.1007/s11366-016-9403-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84965020716
SN - 1080-6954
VL - 21
SP - 177
EP - 197
JO - Journal of Chinese Political Science
JF - Journal of Chinese Political Science
IS - 2
ER -