Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary

Shufeng Ma, Jie Zhang, Richard C Anderson, Joshua Morris, Kim Thi Nguyen-Jahiel, Brian Miller, May Jadallah, Jingjing Sun, Tzu Jung Lin, Theresa Scott, Yu Li Hsu, Xin Zhang, Beata Latawiec, Kay Grabow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Instructional influences on productive use of academic vocabulary were investigated among 460 mostly African American and Latina/o fifth graders from 36 classrooms in eight public schools serving low-income families. Students received a 6-week unit on wolf management involving collaborative group work (CG) or direct instruction (DI). The big question that students tried to answer during the unit was whether a community should be permitted to destroy a pack of wolves. In an individual oral interview about an analogue to the wolf question, whether whaling should be allowed, both CG and DI students used more general and domain-specific academic vocabulary from the Wolf Unit than uninstructed control students. CG students used more general academic vocabulary in the whale interview than DI students, and this was mediated by the CG students' greater use of general academic vocabulary in classroom dialogue during the Wolf Unit. These results suggest that CG is an effective instructional approach to promote acquisition and productive use of academic vocabulary for children from underserved communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-61
Number of pages22
JournalDiscourse Processes
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017

Fingerprint

vocabulary
group work
Students
student
instruction
classroom
interview
Academic Vocabulary
community
low income
dialogue
Direct Instruction
management
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Ma, S., Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Miller, B., ... Grabow, K. (2017). Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary. Discourse Processes, 54(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889

Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary. / Ma, Shufeng; Zhang, Jie; Anderson, Richard C; Morris, Joshua; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi; Miller, Brian; Jadallah, May; Sun, Jingjing; Lin, Tzu Jung; Scott, Theresa; Hsu, Yu Li; Zhang, Xin; Latawiec, Beata; Grabow, Kay.

In: Discourse Processes, Vol. 54, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 40-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ma, S, Zhang, J, Anderson, RC, Morris, J, Nguyen-Jahiel, KT, Miller, B, Jadallah, M, Sun, J, Lin, TJ, Scott, T, Hsu, YL, Zhang, X, Latawiec, B & Grabow, K 2017, 'Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary', Discourse Processes, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 40-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889
Ma S, Zhang J, Anderson RC, Morris J, Nguyen-Jahiel KT, Miller B et al. Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary. Discourse Processes. 2017 Jan 2;54(1):40-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889
Ma, Shufeng ; Zhang, Jie ; Anderson, Richard C ; Morris, Joshua ; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi ; Miller, Brian ; Jadallah, May ; Sun, Jingjing ; Lin, Tzu Jung ; Scott, Theresa ; Hsu, Yu Li ; Zhang, Xin ; Latawiec, Beata ; Grabow, Kay. / Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary. In: Discourse Processes. 2017 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 40-61.
@article{841b8790098d4426ae4eb855e2cb1bcc,
title = "Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary",
abstract = "Instructional influences on productive use of academic vocabulary were investigated among 460 mostly African American and Latina/o fifth graders from 36 classrooms in eight public schools serving low-income families. Students received a 6-week unit on wolf management involving collaborative group work (CG) or direct instruction (DI). The big question that students tried to answer during the unit was whether a community should be permitted to destroy a pack of wolves. In an individual oral interview about an analogue to the wolf question, whether whaling should be allowed, both CG and DI students used more general and domain-specific academic vocabulary from the Wolf Unit than uninstructed control students. CG students used more general academic vocabulary in the whale interview than DI students, and this was mediated by the CG students' greater use of general academic vocabulary in classroom dialogue during the Wolf Unit. These results suggest that CG is an effective instructional approach to promote acquisition and productive use of academic vocabulary for children from underserved communities.",
author = "Shufeng Ma and Jie Zhang and Anderson, {Richard C} and Joshua Morris and Nguyen-Jahiel, {Kim Thi} and Brian Miller and May Jadallah and Jingjing Sun and Lin, {Tzu Jung} and Theresa Scott and Hsu, {Yu Li} and Xin Zhang and Beata Latawiec and Kay Grabow",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "40--61",
journal = "Discourse Processes",
issn = "0163-853X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary

AU - Ma, Shufeng

AU - Zhang, Jie

AU - Anderson, Richard C

AU - Morris, Joshua

AU - Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi

AU - Miller, Brian

AU - Jadallah, May

AU - Sun, Jingjing

AU - Lin, Tzu Jung

AU - Scott, Theresa

AU - Hsu, Yu Li

AU - Zhang, Xin

AU - Latawiec, Beata

AU - Grabow, Kay

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - Instructional influences on productive use of academic vocabulary were investigated among 460 mostly African American and Latina/o fifth graders from 36 classrooms in eight public schools serving low-income families. Students received a 6-week unit on wolf management involving collaborative group work (CG) or direct instruction (DI). The big question that students tried to answer during the unit was whether a community should be permitted to destroy a pack of wolves. In an individual oral interview about an analogue to the wolf question, whether whaling should be allowed, both CG and DI students used more general and domain-specific academic vocabulary from the Wolf Unit than uninstructed control students. CG students used more general academic vocabulary in the whale interview than DI students, and this was mediated by the CG students' greater use of general academic vocabulary in classroom dialogue during the Wolf Unit. These results suggest that CG is an effective instructional approach to promote acquisition and productive use of academic vocabulary for children from underserved communities.

AB - Instructional influences on productive use of academic vocabulary were investigated among 460 mostly African American and Latina/o fifth graders from 36 classrooms in eight public schools serving low-income families. Students received a 6-week unit on wolf management involving collaborative group work (CG) or direct instruction (DI). The big question that students tried to answer during the unit was whether a community should be permitted to destroy a pack of wolves. In an individual oral interview about an analogue to the wolf question, whether whaling should be allowed, both CG and DI students used more general and domain-specific academic vocabulary from the Wolf Unit than uninstructed control students. CG students used more general academic vocabulary in the whale interview than DI students, and this was mediated by the CG students' greater use of general academic vocabulary in classroom dialogue during the Wolf Unit. These results suggest that CG is an effective instructional approach to promote acquisition and productive use of academic vocabulary for children from underserved communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979992210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979992210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889

DO - 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166889

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84979992210

VL - 54

SP - 40

EP - 61

JO - Discourse Processes

JF - Discourse Processes

SN - 0163-853X

IS - 1

ER -