TY - JOUR
T1 - Chemical composition and bioethanol potential of different plant species found in Pacific Northwest conservation buffers
AU - Kumar, Deepak
AU - Juneja, Ankita
AU - Hohenschuh, William
AU - Williams, John D.
AU - Murthy, Ganti S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was made possible through the cooperation of the following landowners and managers: Cunningham Sheep Farm, Newtson Family Farms, Bracher Family Farms, and Billy Lorenzen in Umatilla County, and the Cook Agronomy Farm—Washington State University and the Palouse Conservation Field Station—U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service, in Whitman County. This research was funded by Western Sun Grant Center and Department of Transportation, Oregon State University, and USDA-ARS base funding through national program Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability. We thank Dave Robertson, Daryl Haasch, Seren Waite, and Dave Uberuaga for field data collection and plot management. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Authors would also like to thank Dr. Michael Penner, Food Science and Technology Department, Oregon State University for allowing use of soxhlet apparatus in his lab.
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - Lands producing mixed lignocellulosic ethanol feedstocks may be able to produce more biomass with fewer resources than conventional monoculture crops, but lignocellulosic ethanol production processes and efficiencies can be highly dependent on feedstock composition. In this study, plants were collected from areas planted to simulate conservation buffers alongside stream channels within three common resource areas the interior Pacific Northwest. Two grasses (tall wheatgrass and alfalfa) and seven forb species (fiddleneck tarweed, dog fennel, kochia, downey brome, tall annual willowherb, prickly lettuce, and tumble mustard) commonly found in these buffers were examined to determine their chemical composition, potential bioethanol yields, and difficulties that may arise if they were to be harvested and processed in a single facility. Potential ethanol yields calculated on the basis of sugar monomer composition in the biomass ranged from 181.5 to 316.5l/dry ton of biomass. Significant differences were noted in terms of structural sugars (cellulose 19%-33% w/w; hemicellulose 14%-26% w/w), lignin (10%-18% w/w), extractives (20%-40% w/w), and ash content (4.0%-13.8% w/w). These composition variations could vary the processing efficiency in terms of sugar recovery and eventual ethanol production yield.
AB - Lands producing mixed lignocellulosic ethanol feedstocks may be able to produce more biomass with fewer resources than conventional monoculture crops, but lignocellulosic ethanol production processes and efficiencies can be highly dependent on feedstock composition. In this study, plants were collected from areas planted to simulate conservation buffers alongside stream channels within three common resource areas the interior Pacific Northwest. Two grasses (tall wheatgrass and alfalfa) and seven forb species (fiddleneck tarweed, dog fennel, kochia, downey brome, tall annual willowherb, prickly lettuce, and tumble mustard) commonly found in these buffers were examined to determine their chemical composition, potential bioethanol yields, and difficulties that may arise if they were to be harvested and processed in a single facility. Potential ethanol yields calculated on the basis of sugar monomer composition in the biomass ranged from 181.5 to 316.5l/dry ton of biomass. Significant differences were noted in terms of structural sugars (cellulose 19%-33% w/w; hemicellulose 14%-26% w/w), lignin (10%-18% w/w), extractives (20%-40% w/w), and ash content (4.0%-13.8% w/w). These composition variations could vary the processing efficiency in terms of sugar recovery and eventual ethanol production yield.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875420558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875420558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.4766889
DO - 10.1063/1.4766889
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84875420558
SN - 1941-7012
VL - 4
JO - Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
JF - Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
IS - 6
M1 - 063114
ER -