TY - CHAP
T1 - Characterizing configuration spaces of simple threshold cellular automata
AU - Tosic, Predrag T.
AU - Agha, Gui A.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - We study herewith the simple threshold cellular automata (CA), as perhaps the simplest broad class of CA with non-additive (that is, non-linear and non-affine) local update rules. We characterize all possible computations of the most interesting rule for such CA, namely, the Majority (MAJ) rule, both in the classical, parallel CA case, and in case of the corresponding sequential CA where the nodes update sequentially, one at a time. We compare and contrast the configuration spaces of arbitrary simple threshold automata in those two cases, and point out that some parallel threshold CA cannot be simulated by any of their sequential equivalents. We show that the temporal cycles exist only in case of (some) parallel simple threshold CA, but can never take place in sequential threshold CA. We also show that most threshold CA have very few fixed point configurations and few (if any) cycle configurations, and that, while the MAJ sequential and parallel CA may have many fixed points, nonetheless "almost all" configurations, in both parallel and sequential cases, are transient states. Finally, motivated by the contrasts between parallel and sequential simple threshold CA, we try to motivate the study of genuinely asynchronous CA.
AB - We study herewith the simple threshold cellular automata (CA), as perhaps the simplest broad class of CA with non-additive (that is, non-linear and non-affine) local update rules. We characterize all possible computations of the most interesting rule for such CA, namely, the Majority (MAJ) rule, both in the classical, parallel CA case, and in case of the corresponding sequential CA where the nodes update sequentially, one at a time. We compare and contrast the configuration spaces of arbitrary simple threshold automata in those two cases, and point out that some parallel threshold CA cannot be simulated by any of their sequential equivalents. We show that the temporal cycles exist only in case of (some) parallel simple threshold CA, but can never take place in sequential threshold CA. We also show that most threshold CA have very few fixed point configurations and few (if any) cycle configurations, and that, while the MAJ sequential and parallel CA may have many fixed points, nonetheless "almost all" configurations, in both parallel and sequential cases, are transient states. Finally, motivated by the contrasts between parallel and sequential simple threshold CA, we try to motivate the study of genuinely asynchronous CA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944481898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944481898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-540-30479-1_89
DO - 10.1007/978-3-540-30479-1_89
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:27944481898
SN - 3540235965
SN - 9783540235965
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 861
EP - 870
BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
A2 - Sloot, Peter M. A.
A2 - Hoekstra, Alfons G.
A2 - Chopard, Bastien
PB - Springer
ER -