TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization and Optimization of l∞ Gains of Linear Switched Systems
AU - Naghnaeian, Mohammad
AU - Voulgaris, Petros G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under NSF Award NSF ECCS 10-27437 and AFOSR under award AF FA 9550-12-1-0193. Recommended by Associate Editor J. Daafouz.
Publisher Copyright:
© 1963-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - In this paper, we consider the l∞gain characterizations of linear switched systems (LSS) and present various relevant results on their exact computation and optimization. Depending on the role of the switching sequence, we study two broad cases: first, when the switching sequence attempts to maximize, and second, when it attempts to minimize the l∞gain. The first, named as worst-case throughout the paper, can be related to robustness of the system to uncontrolled switching; the second relates to situations when the switching can be part to the overall decision making. Although, in general, the exact computation of l∞gains is difficult, we provide specific classes, the input-output switching systems, for which it is shown that linear programming can be used to obtain the worst-case l∞gain. This is a sufficiently rich class of systems as any stable LSS can be approximated by one. Certain applications to robust control design are provided where we show that a switched compensation independently of the plant has no advantage over a linear time invariant (LTI) compensation, and further, if the plant is strictly causal, even a switched compensation which has a matched switching with the plant does not provide a better performance over an LTI compensation. Also, we present a new necessary and sufficient condition to check the stability of LSS in form of a model matching problem. On the other hand, if one is interested in minimizing the l∞gain over the switching sequences, we show that, for finite impulse response (FIR) switching systems the minimizing switching sequence can be chosen to be periodic. For input-only or output-only switching an exact, readily computable, characterization of the minimal l∞gain is provided, and it is shown that the minimizing switching sequence is constant, which, as also shown, is not true for input-output switching.
AB - In this paper, we consider the l∞gain characterizations of linear switched systems (LSS) and present various relevant results on their exact computation and optimization. Depending on the role of the switching sequence, we study two broad cases: first, when the switching sequence attempts to maximize, and second, when it attempts to minimize the l∞gain. The first, named as worst-case throughout the paper, can be related to robustness of the system to uncontrolled switching; the second relates to situations when the switching can be part to the overall decision making. Although, in general, the exact computation of l∞gains is difficult, we provide specific classes, the input-output switching systems, for which it is shown that linear programming can be used to obtain the worst-case l∞gain. This is a sufficiently rich class of systems as any stable LSS can be approximated by one. Certain applications to robust control design are provided where we show that a switched compensation independently of the plant has no advantage over a linear time invariant (LTI) compensation, and further, if the plant is strictly causal, even a switched compensation which has a matched switching with the plant does not provide a better performance over an LTI compensation. Also, we present a new necessary and sufficient condition to check the stability of LSS in form of a model matching problem. On the other hand, if one is interested in minimizing the l∞gain over the switching sequences, we show that, for finite impulse response (FIR) switching systems the minimizing switching sequence can be chosen to be periodic. For input-only or output-only switching an exact, readily computable, characterization of the minimal l∞gain is provided, and it is shown that the minimizing switching sequence is constant, which, as also shown, is not true for input-output switching.
KW - Linear programming
KW - l performace
KW - linear switched systems
KW - robust control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982701593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982701593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TAC.2015.2494369
DO - 10.1109/TAC.2015.2494369
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84982701593
SN - 0018-9286
VL - 61
SP - 2203
EP - 2218
JO - IRE Transactions on Automatic Control
JF - IRE Transactions on Automatic Control
IS - 8
M1 - 7307135
ER -