CHAPTER 7: PRIVACY AND AUTONOMY.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2003, the American Law Institute launched a project to restate the common law of employment. Shortly thereafter the Labor Law Group (LLG), an organization founded in 1948 composed of law faculty who research and teach in that area, though it well to consider what the ALI was doing. The Group’s overture to the ALI, more closely to engage with it, was rebuffed. As the ALI project progressed two LLG conferences critiquing the project’s work-in-progress were held and the proceedings published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal. The ALI’s Reporters declined the Group’s invitation to attend both conferences; their subsequent drafts declined to acknowledge the Group’s criticisms. The final text of the Restatement was adopted by the ALI in 2015. The LLG held a summarizing conference at the Indiana University School of Law in November, 2016. The ALI’s Reporters were invited and again declined to attend. The collection to be published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.

This essay, part of the Group’s chapter-by-chapter critique, unpacks the document’s treatment of the law of employee privacy and autonomy. It concludes that by the ALI’s own standards the document is at all critical points opaque and incoherent, wanting in explanatory content or expository power. The document’s basic thrust is to “have the law buttress managerial prerogative and reify the status of employee as servant.”
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)589-621
Number of pages33
JournalEmployee Rights & Employment Policy Journal
Volume21
Issue number2
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

privacy
autonomy
labor law
Law
employee
Group
employment policy
reporter
servants
common law
criticism
organization
school

Keywords

  • Good faith (Law)
  • Labor laws
  • Labor disputes -- United States
  • Industrial relations -- United States
  • Restatements of the law
  • United States

Cite this

CHAPTER 7 : PRIVACY AND AUTONOMY. / FINKIN, MATTHEW W.

In: Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.10.2017, p. 589-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{376e2b75448d481ba3a6a6d97b12e3b5,
title = "CHAPTER 7: PRIVACY AND AUTONOMY.",
abstract = "In 2003, the American Law Institute launched a project to restate the common law of employment. Shortly thereafter the Labor Law Group (LLG), an organization founded in 1948 composed of law faculty who research and teach in that area, though it well to consider what the ALI was doing. The Group’s overture to the ALI, more closely to engage with it, was rebuffed. As the ALI project progressed two LLG conferences critiquing the project’s work-in-progress were held and the proceedings published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal. The ALI’s Reporters declined the Group’s invitation to attend both conferences; their subsequent drafts declined to acknowledge the Group’s criticisms. The final text of the Restatement was adopted by the ALI in 2015. The LLG held a summarizing conference at the Indiana University School of Law in November, 2016. The ALI’s Reporters were invited and again declined to attend. The collection to be published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.This essay, part of the Group’s chapter-by-chapter critique, unpacks the document’s treatment of the law of employee privacy and autonomy. It concludes that by the ALI’s own standards the document is at all critical points opaque and incoherent, wanting in explanatory content or expository power. The document’s basic thrust is to “have the law buttress managerial prerogative and reify the status of employee as servant.”",
keywords = "Good faith (Law), Labor laws, Labor disputes -- United States, Industrial relations -- United States, Restatements of the law, United States",
author = "FINKIN, {MATTHEW W.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "589--621",
journal = "Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal",
issn = "1522-2225",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CHAPTER 7

T2 - PRIVACY AND AUTONOMY.

AU - FINKIN, MATTHEW W.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - In 2003, the American Law Institute launched a project to restate the common law of employment. Shortly thereafter the Labor Law Group (LLG), an organization founded in 1948 composed of law faculty who research and teach in that area, though it well to consider what the ALI was doing. The Group’s overture to the ALI, more closely to engage with it, was rebuffed. As the ALI project progressed two LLG conferences critiquing the project’s work-in-progress were held and the proceedings published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal. The ALI’s Reporters declined the Group’s invitation to attend both conferences; their subsequent drafts declined to acknowledge the Group’s criticisms. The final text of the Restatement was adopted by the ALI in 2015. The LLG held a summarizing conference at the Indiana University School of Law in November, 2016. The ALI’s Reporters were invited and again declined to attend. The collection to be published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.This essay, part of the Group’s chapter-by-chapter critique, unpacks the document’s treatment of the law of employee privacy and autonomy. It concludes that by the ALI’s own standards the document is at all critical points opaque and incoherent, wanting in explanatory content or expository power. The document’s basic thrust is to “have the law buttress managerial prerogative and reify the status of employee as servant.”

AB - In 2003, the American Law Institute launched a project to restate the common law of employment. Shortly thereafter the Labor Law Group (LLG), an organization founded in 1948 composed of law faculty who research and teach in that area, though it well to consider what the ALI was doing. The Group’s overture to the ALI, more closely to engage with it, was rebuffed. As the ALI project progressed two LLG conferences critiquing the project’s work-in-progress were held and the proceedings published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal. The ALI’s Reporters declined the Group’s invitation to attend both conferences; their subsequent drafts declined to acknowledge the Group’s criticisms. The final text of the Restatement was adopted by the ALI in 2015. The LLG held a summarizing conference at the Indiana University School of Law in November, 2016. The ALI’s Reporters were invited and again declined to attend. The collection to be published in the Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.This essay, part of the Group’s chapter-by-chapter critique, unpacks the document’s treatment of the law of employee privacy and autonomy. It concludes that by the ALI’s own standards the document is at all critical points opaque and incoherent, wanting in explanatory content or expository power. The document’s basic thrust is to “have the law buttress managerial prerogative and reify the status of employee as servant.”

KW - Good faith (Law)

KW - Labor laws

KW - Labor disputes -- United States

KW - Industrial relations -- United States

KW - Restatements of the law

KW - United States

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 589

EP - 621

JO - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

JF - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

SN - 1522-2225

IS - 2

ER -