Changing ecosystem service values following technological change

Jordi Honey-Rosés, Daniel W. Schneider, Nicholas Brozović

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Research on ecosystem services has focused mostly on natural areas or remote places, with less attention given to urban ecosystem services and their relationship with technological change. However, recent work by urban ecologists and urban designers has more closely examined and appreciated the opportunities associated with integrating natural and built infrastructures. Nevertheless, a perception remains in the literature on ecosystem services that technology may easily and irreversibly substitute for services previously obtained from ecosystems, especially when the superiority of the engineered system motivated replacement in the first place. We emphasize that the expected tradeoff between natural and manufactured capital is false. Rather, as argued in other contexts, the adoption of new technologies is complementary to ecosystem management. The complementarity of ecosystem services and technology is illustrated with a case study in Barcelona, Spain where the installation of sophisticated water treatment technology increased the value of the ecosystem services found there. Interestingly, the complementarity between natural and built infrastructures may remain even for the very ecosystems that are affected by the technological change. This finding suggests that we can expect the value of ecosystem services to co-evolve with new technologies. Technological innovation can generate new opportunities to harness value from ecosystems, and the engineered structures found in cities may generate more reliance on ecosystem processes, not less.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1146-1157
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

technological change
ecosystem service
Ecosystems
ecosystem
complementarity
infrastructure
urban ecosystem
ecosystem management
water treatment
innovation
replacement
Water treatment
Innovation

Keywords

  • Desalination
  • Ecosystem services
  • Green infrastructure
  • Natural capital
  • Substitution
  • Technology
  • Urban ecosystems
  • Urban planning
  • Water treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Pollution

Cite this

Changing ecosystem service values following technological change. / Honey-Rosés, Jordi; Schneider, Daniel W.; Brozović, Nicholas.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 53, No. 6, 06.2014, p. 1146-1157.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Honey-Rosés, Jordi ; Schneider, Daniel W. ; Brozović, Nicholas. / Changing ecosystem service values following technological change. In: Environmental Management. 2014 ; Vol. 53, No. 6. pp. 1146-1157.
@article{25e662b2ac7a46d0a176da5f3a86b784,
title = "Changing ecosystem service values following technological change",
abstract = "Research on ecosystem services has focused mostly on natural areas or remote places, with less attention given to urban ecosystem services and their relationship with technological change. However, recent work by urban ecologists and urban designers has more closely examined and appreciated the opportunities associated with integrating natural and built infrastructures. Nevertheless, a perception remains in the literature on ecosystem services that technology may easily and irreversibly substitute for services previously obtained from ecosystems, especially when the superiority of the engineered system motivated replacement in the first place. We emphasize that the expected tradeoff between natural and manufactured capital is false. Rather, as argued in other contexts, the adoption of new technologies is complementary to ecosystem management. The complementarity of ecosystem services and technology is illustrated with a case study in Barcelona, Spain where the installation of sophisticated water treatment technology increased the value of the ecosystem services found there. Interestingly, the complementarity between natural and built infrastructures may remain even for the very ecosystems that are affected by the technological change. This finding suggests that we can expect the value of ecosystem services to co-evolve with new technologies. Technological innovation can generate new opportunities to harness value from ecosystems, and the engineered structures found in cities may generate more reliance on ecosystem processes, not less.",
keywords = "Desalination, Ecosystem services, Green infrastructure, Natural capital, Substitution, Technology, Urban ecosystems, Urban planning, Water treatment",
author = "Jordi Honey-Ros{\'e}s and Schneider, {Daniel W.} and Nicholas Brozović",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-014-0270-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "1146--1157",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing ecosystem service values following technological change

AU - Honey-Rosés, Jordi

AU - Schneider, Daniel W.

AU - Brozović, Nicholas

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Research on ecosystem services has focused mostly on natural areas or remote places, with less attention given to urban ecosystem services and their relationship with technological change. However, recent work by urban ecologists and urban designers has more closely examined and appreciated the opportunities associated with integrating natural and built infrastructures. Nevertheless, a perception remains in the literature on ecosystem services that technology may easily and irreversibly substitute for services previously obtained from ecosystems, especially when the superiority of the engineered system motivated replacement in the first place. We emphasize that the expected tradeoff between natural and manufactured capital is false. Rather, as argued in other contexts, the adoption of new technologies is complementary to ecosystem management. The complementarity of ecosystem services and technology is illustrated with a case study in Barcelona, Spain where the installation of sophisticated water treatment technology increased the value of the ecosystem services found there. Interestingly, the complementarity between natural and built infrastructures may remain even for the very ecosystems that are affected by the technological change. This finding suggests that we can expect the value of ecosystem services to co-evolve with new technologies. Technological innovation can generate new opportunities to harness value from ecosystems, and the engineered structures found in cities may generate more reliance on ecosystem processes, not less.

AB - Research on ecosystem services has focused mostly on natural areas or remote places, with less attention given to urban ecosystem services and their relationship with technological change. However, recent work by urban ecologists and urban designers has more closely examined and appreciated the opportunities associated with integrating natural and built infrastructures. Nevertheless, a perception remains in the literature on ecosystem services that technology may easily and irreversibly substitute for services previously obtained from ecosystems, especially when the superiority of the engineered system motivated replacement in the first place. We emphasize that the expected tradeoff between natural and manufactured capital is false. Rather, as argued in other contexts, the adoption of new technologies is complementary to ecosystem management. The complementarity of ecosystem services and technology is illustrated with a case study in Barcelona, Spain where the installation of sophisticated water treatment technology increased the value of the ecosystem services found there. Interestingly, the complementarity between natural and built infrastructures may remain even for the very ecosystems that are affected by the technological change. This finding suggests that we can expect the value of ecosystem services to co-evolve with new technologies. Technological innovation can generate new opportunities to harness value from ecosystems, and the engineered structures found in cities may generate more reliance on ecosystem processes, not less.

KW - Desalination

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Green infrastructure

KW - Natural capital

KW - Substitution

KW - Technology

KW - Urban ecosystems

KW - Urban planning

KW - Water treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902279365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902279365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-014-0270-6

DO - 10.1007/s00267-014-0270-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24752336

AN - SCOPUS:84902279365

VL - 53

SP - 1146

EP - 1157

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 6

ER -