TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors
T2 - A latent growth curve approach
AU - Dai, Ting
AU - Cromley, Jennifer G.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the students who participated in the study, the instructors of the courses from which students volunteered, and the Temple University Measurement and Research Center. We thank Denis Dumas, Lillian Raja, Dar Sheth, Jaccquelyn Pinto, and Ingelle Townsend for assistance with data collection. The research reported herein was supported by NSF (REESE) award #0814901 , A Multimethod Approach to Understanding Dropout from STEM Gateway Courses; all statements are the authors’ own opinions and do not reflect the policies of NSF or the US Government.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - This longitudinal study was designed to investigate the associations between changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and college students' dropout from STEM majors. We modeled the one-year growth patterns of entity and incremental beliefs about ability in biology with 4 time points of self-reported data and two covariates-biology domain knowledge and inference making and gateway course grade, and predicted STEM dropout with the growth trajectories of implicit theories. Results indicated that students' entity beliefs increased, while incremental beliefs decreased over time, which provides support for the changeability of implicit beliefs over a short period of time. The growth of incremental beliefs was directly associated with STEM dropout above and beyond biology course grade and biology domain knowledge and inference making. Low intercept and negative slope of incremental beliefs predicted leaving STEM majors; however, the decline of entity beliefs did not have significant effects on dropout. Interestingly, the effect of biology domain knowledge and inference making on STEM dropout was mediated by biology course grade and incremental beliefs. The findings imply the importance of monitoring changes in students' implicit beliefs and gateway course achievement in order to better understand and promote STEM retention.
AB - This longitudinal study was designed to investigate the associations between changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and college students' dropout from STEM majors. We modeled the one-year growth patterns of entity and incremental beliefs about ability in biology with 4 time points of self-reported data and two covariates-biology domain knowledge and inference making and gateway course grade, and predicted STEM dropout with the growth trajectories of implicit theories. Results indicated that students' entity beliefs increased, while incremental beliefs decreased over time, which provides support for the changeability of implicit beliefs over a short period of time. The growth of incremental beliefs was directly associated with STEM dropout above and beyond biology course grade and biology domain knowledge and inference making. Low intercept and negative slope of incremental beliefs predicted leaving STEM majors; however, the decline of entity beliefs did not have significant effects on dropout. Interestingly, the effect of biology domain knowledge and inference making on STEM dropout was mediated by biology course grade and incremental beliefs. The findings imply the importance of monitoring changes in students' implicit beliefs and gateway course achievement in order to better understand and promote STEM retention.
KW - Gateway course achievement
KW - Implicit theories
KW - Latent growth curve modeling
KW - STEM retention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902962061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902962061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84902962061
SN - 0361-476X
VL - 39
SP - 233
EP - 247
JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology
JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology
IS - 3
ER -