Challenging legal consciousness: Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Even though the term never appears in the article, “The Oven Bird’s Song” is one of the foundational articles in studies of legal consciousness. Engel did not define the concept in “The Oven Bird’s Song,” even though we could reasonably say that the entire article is about what we have come to recognize as legal consciousness. In the article, Engel analyzes how individual members of a community think about law and legal institutions. The article is also about the things that people did - and didn’t do - to put those beliefs into practice. Engel demonstrated that the community’s value system (to which many individuals subscribed) shaped the way they thought about conflict and even about what an injury was. And in turn, this “mangle” of action and belief created a unique legal environment - what we now refer to as legality: “the meanings, sources of authority and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them, or for what purposes.” Even as he laid a foundation for studies of legal consciousness, Engel also anticipated some of the significant debates in that tradition. By analyzing the legal significance of what ordinary people think and do, Engel demonstrated that law is a thread that runs through everyday life. In this chapter, I describe three debates in legal consciousness research and show how reading Engel’s study of Sander County offers a fresh perspective on those debates and poses challenges for those of us working in the field. First, I consider the significance of silence as the practice of legal consciousness, particularly when that silence is wielded by the powerful. Second, context is important. People develop legal consciousness through the institutions they navigate. Thus, legal consciousness is related to the different identities that people develop in different settings. Finally, while law is hegemonic, constructing systems for the powerful in ways that preserve their privilege, people nevertheless draw on legal concepts when trying to resist authority. Thus, I ask whether and what varieties of resistance are made possible through legal consciousness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInsiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law
Subtitle of host publicationRevisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song'
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages71-81
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781316979716
ISBN (Print)9781107188402
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

legal consciousness
song
Law
value system
legality
privilege
everyday life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Marshall, A-M. (2018). Challenging legal consciousness: Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance. In Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song' (pp. 71-81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979716.005

Challenging legal consciousness : Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance. / Marshall, Anna-Maria.

Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song'. Cambridge University Press, 2018. p. 71-81.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Marshall, A-M 2018, Challenging legal consciousness: Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance. in Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song'. Cambridge University Press, pp. 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979716.005
Marshall A-M. Challenging legal consciousness: Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance. In Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song'. Cambridge University Press. 2018. p. 71-81 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979716.005
Marshall, Anna-Maria. / Challenging legal consciousness : Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance. Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song'. Cambridge University Press, 2018. pp. 71-81
@inbook{82b7001e988c406bb609247d9c50ab9c,
title = "Challenging legal consciousness: Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance",
abstract = "Even though the term never appears in the article, “The Oven Bird’s Song” is one of the foundational articles in studies of legal consciousness. Engel did not define the concept in “The Oven Bird’s Song,” even though we could reasonably say that the entire article is about what we have come to recognize as legal consciousness. In the article, Engel analyzes how individual members of a community think about law and legal institutions. The article is also about the things that people did - and didn’t do - to put those beliefs into practice. Engel demonstrated that the community’s value system (to which many individuals subscribed) shaped the way they thought about conflict and even about what an injury was. And in turn, this “mangle” of action and belief created a unique legal environment - what we now refer to as legality: “the meanings, sources of authority and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them, or for what purposes.” Even as he laid a foundation for studies of legal consciousness, Engel also anticipated some of the significant debates in that tradition. By analyzing the legal significance of what ordinary people think and do, Engel demonstrated that law is a thread that runs through everyday life. In this chapter, I describe three debates in legal consciousness research and show how reading Engel’s study of Sander County offers a fresh perspective on those debates and poses challenges for those of us working in the field. First, I consider the significance of silence as the practice of legal consciousness, particularly when that silence is wielded by the powerful. Second, context is important. People develop legal consciousness through the institutions they navigate. Thus, legal consciousness is related to the different identities that people develop in different settings. Finally, while law is hegemonic, constructing systems for the powerful in ways that preserve their privilege, people nevertheless draw on legal concepts when trying to resist authority. Thus, I ask whether and what varieties of resistance are made possible through legal consciousness.",
author = "Anna-Maria Marshall",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781316979716.005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107188402",
pages = "71--81",
booktitle = "Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Challenging legal consciousness

T2 - Practice, institutions, and varieties of resistance

AU - Marshall, Anna-Maria

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Even though the term never appears in the article, “The Oven Bird’s Song” is one of the foundational articles in studies of legal consciousness. Engel did not define the concept in “The Oven Bird’s Song,” even though we could reasonably say that the entire article is about what we have come to recognize as legal consciousness. In the article, Engel analyzes how individual members of a community think about law and legal institutions. The article is also about the things that people did - and didn’t do - to put those beliefs into practice. Engel demonstrated that the community’s value system (to which many individuals subscribed) shaped the way they thought about conflict and even about what an injury was. And in turn, this “mangle” of action and belief created a unique legal environment - what we now refer to as legality: “the meanings, sources of authority and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them, or for what purposes.” Even as he laid a foundation for studies of legal consciousness, Engel also anticipated some of the significant debates in that tradition. By analyzing the legal significance of what ordinary people think and do, Engel demonstrated that law is a thread that runs through everyday life. In this chapter, I describe three debates in legal consciousness research and show how reading Engel’s study of Sander County offers a fresh perspective on those debates and poses challenges for those of us working in the field. First, I consider the significance of silence as the practice of legal consciousness, particularly when that silence is wielded by the powerful. Second, context is important. People develop legal consciousness through the institutions they navigate. Thus, legal consciousness is related to the different identities that people develop in different settings. Finally, while law is hegemonic, constructing systems for the powerful in ways that preserve their privilege, people nevertheless draw on legal concepts when trying to resist authority. Thus, I ask whether and what varieties of resistance are made possible through legal consciousness.

AB - Even though the term never appears in the article, “The Oven Bird’s Song” is one of the foundational articles in studies of legal consciousness. Engel did not define the concept in “The Oven Bird’s Song,” even though we could reasonably say that the entire article is about what we have come to recognize as legal consciousness. In the article, Engel analyzes how individual members of a community think about law and legal institutions. The article is also about the things that people did - and didn’t do - to put those beliefs into practice. Engel demonstrated that the community’s value system (to which many individuals subscribed) shaped the way they thought about conflict and even about what an injury was. And in turn, this “mangle” of action and belief created a unique legal environment - what we now refer to as legality: “the meanings, sources of authority and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them, or for what purposes.” Even as he laid a foundation for studies of legal consciousness, Engel also anticipated some of the significant debates in that tradition. By analyzing the legal significance of what ordinary people think and do, Engel demonstrated that law is a thread that runs through everyday life. In this chapter, I describe three debates in legal consciousness research and show how reading Engel’s study of Sander County offers a fresh perspective on those debates and poses challenges for those of us working in the field. First, I consider the significance of silence as the practice of legal consciousness, particularly when that silence is wielded by the powerful. Second, context is important. People develop legal consciousness through the institutions they navigate. Thus, legal consciousness is related to the different identities that people develop in different settings. Finally, while law is hegemonic, constructing systems for the powerful in ways that preserve their privilege, people nevertheless draw on legal concepts when trying to resist authority. Thus, I ask whether and what varieties of resistance are made possible through legal consciousness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048686325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048686325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781316979716.005

DO - 10.1017/9781316979716.005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85048686325

SN - 9781107188402

SP - 71

EP - 81

BT - Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -