Challenging gender stereotypes: Theory of mind and peer group dynamics

Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Michael T. Rizzo, Melanie Killen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To investigate the social cognitive skills related to challenging gender stereotypes, children (N = 61, 3–6 years) evaluated a peer who challenged gender stereotypic norms held by the peer's group. Participants with false belief theory of mind (FB ToM) competence were more likely than participants who did not have FB ToM to expect a peer to challenge the group's stereotypes and propose that the group engage in a non-stereotypic activity. Further, participants with FB ToM rated challenging the peer group more positively. Participants without FB ToM did not differentiate between their own and the group's evaluation of challenges to the group's stereotypic norms, but those with ToM competence asserted that they would be more supportive of challenging the group norm than would the peer group. Results reveal the importance of social-cognitive competencies for recognizing the legitimacy of challenging stereotypes, and for understanding one's own and other group perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1010
Number of pages12
JournalDevelopmental science
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenging gender stereotypes: Theory of mind and peer group dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this