Categorization influences detection: A perceptual advantage for representative exemplars of natural scene categories

Eamon Caddigan, Heeyoung Choo, Li Fei-Fei, Diane M Beck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditional models of recognition and categorization proceed from registering low-level features, perceptually organizing that input, and linking it with stored representations. Recent evidence, however, suggests that this serial model may not be accurate, with object and category knowledge affecting rather than following early visual processing. Here, we show that the degree to which an image exemplifies its category influences how easily it is detected. Participants performed a twoalternative forced-choice task in which they indicated whether a briefly presented image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. Critically, the category of the scene is irrelevant to the detection task. We nonetheless found that participants ''see'' good images better, more accurately discriminating them from phase-scrambled images than bad scenes, and this advantage is apparent regardless of whether participants are asked to consider category during the experiment or not. We then demonstrate that good exemplars are more similar to same-category images than bad exemplars, influencing behavior in two ways: First, prototypical images are easier to detect, and second, intact good scenes are more likely than bad to have been primed by a previous trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number21
JournalJournal of vision
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Detection
  • Scene perception
  • Similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Categorization influences detection : A perceptual advantage for representative exemplars of natural scene categories. / Caddigan, Eamon; Choo, Heeyoung; Fei-Fei, Li; Beck, Diane M.

In: Journal of vision, Vol. 17, No. 1, 21, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d31494e12564bc6b90ea99b37c387f2,
title = "Categorization influences detection: A perceptual advantage for representative exemplars of natural scene categories",
abstract = "Traditional models of recognition and categorization proceed from registering low-level features, perceptually organizing that input, and linking it with stored representations. Recent evidence, however, suggests that this serial model may not be accurate, with object and category knowledge affecting rather than following early visual processing. Here, we show that the degree to which an image exemplifies its category influences how easily it is detected. Participants performed a twoalternative forced-choice task in which they indicated whether a briefly presented image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. Critically, the category of the scene is irrelevant to the detection task. We nonetheless found that participants ''see'' good images better, more accurately discriminating them from phase-scrambled images than bad scenes, and this advantage is apparent regardless of whether participants are asked to consider category during the experiment or not. We then demonstrate that good exemplars are more similar to same-category images than bad exemplars, influencing behavior in two ways: First, prototypical images are easier to detect, and second, intact good scenes are more likely than bad to have been primed by a previous trial.",
keywords = "Categorization, Detection, Scene perception, Similarity",
author = "Eamon Caddigan and Heeyoung Choo and Li Fei-Fei and Beck, {Diane M}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/17.1.21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categorization influences detection

T2 - A perceptual advantage for representative exemplars of natural scene categories

AU - Caddigan, Eamon

AU - Choo, Heeyoung

AU - Fei-Fei, Li

AU - Beck, Diane M

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Traditional models of recognition and categorization proceed from registering low-level features, perceptually organizing that input, and linking it with stored representations. Recent evidence, however, suggests that this serial model may not be accurate, with object and category knowledge affecting rather than following early visual processing. Here, we show that the degree to which an image exemplifies its category influences how easily it is detected. Participants performed a twoalternative forced-choice task in which they indicated whether a briefly presented image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. Critically, the category of the scene is irrelevant to the detection task. We nonetheless found that participants ''see'' good images better, more accurately discriminating them from phase-scrambled images than bad scenes, and this advantage is apparent regardless of whether participants are asked to consider category during the experiment or not. We then demonstrate that good exemplars are more similar to same-category images than bad exemplars, influencing behavior in two ways: First, prototypical images are easier to detect, and second, intact good scenes are more likely than bad to have been primed by a previous trial.

AB - Traditional models of recognition and categorization proceed from registering low-level features, perceptually organizing that input, and linking it with stored representations. Recent evidence, however, suggests that this serial model may not be accurate, with object and category knowledge affecting rather than following early visual processing. Here, we show that the degree to which an image exemplifies its category influences how easily it is detected. Participants performed a twoalternative forced-choice task in which they indicated whether a briefly presented image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. Critically, the category of the scene is irrelevant to the detection task. We nonetheless found that participants ''see'' good images better, more accurately discriminating them from phase-scrambled images than bad scenes, and this advantage is apparent regardless of whether participants are asked to consider category during the experiment or not. We then demonstrate that good exemplars are more similar to same-category images than bad exemplars, influencing behavior in two ways: First, prototypical images are easier to detect, and second, intact good scenes are more likely than bad to have been primed by a previous trial.

KW - Categorization

KW - Detection

KW - Scene perception

KW - Similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010460500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010460500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/17.1.21

DO - 10.1167/17.1.21

M3 - Article

C2 - 28114496

AN - SCOPUS:85010460500

VL - 17

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 1

M1 - 21

ER -