Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy

A new model and predictions

Maayan Stavans, Yi Lin, Di Wu, Renee L Baillargeon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Comparison of infant findings from the physical-reasoning and object-individuation literatures reveals a contradictory picture. On the one hand, physical-reasoning results indicate that young infants can use featural information to guide their actions on objects and to detect interaction violations (when objects interact in ways that are not physically possible) as well as change violations (when objects spontaneously undergo featural changes that are not physically possible). On the other hand, object-individuation results indicate that young infants typically cannot use featural information to detect individuation violations (when the number of objects revealed at the end of an event is less than the number of objects introduced during the event). In this article, we attempt to reconcile these two bodies of research. In a new model of early individuation, we propose that two systems help infants individuate objects in physical events: the object-file and physical-reasoning systems. Under certain conditions, disagreements between the systems result in catastrophic individuation failures, leading infants to hold no expectation at all about how many objects are present. We report experiments with 9- to 11-month-old infants (N = 216) that tested predictions from the model. After two objects emerged in alternation from behind a screen, infants detected no violation when the screen was lowered to reveal no object. Similarly, after two objects emerged in alternation from inside a box, which was then shaken, infants detected no violation when the box remained silent, as though empty. We end with new directions, suggested by our model, for research on early object representations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-225
Number of pages30
JournalPsychological review
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Individuation
Research

Keywords

  • Infant cognition
  • Object individuation
  • Object-file system
  • Physical-reasoning system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy : A new model and predictions. / Stavans, Maayan; Lin, Yi; Wu, Di; Baillargeon, Renee L.

In: Psychological review, Vol. 126, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 196-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Stavans, Maayan ; Lin, Yi ; Wu, Di ; Baillargeon, Renee L. / Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy : A new model and predictions. In: Psychological review. 2019 ; Vol. 126, No. 2. pp. 196-225.
@article{0a20346e494d46c2955c0030f29f6fa5,
title = "Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions",
abstract = "Comparison of infant findings from the physical-reasoning and object-individuation literatures reveals a contradictory picture. On the one hand, physical-reasoning results indicate that young infants can use featural information to guide their actions on objects and to detect interaction violations (when objects interact in ways that are not physically possible) as well as change violations (when objects spontaneously undergo featural changes that are not physically possible). On the other hand, object-individuation results indicate that young infants typically cannot use featural information to detect individuation violations (when the number of objects revealed at the end of an event is less than the number of objects introduced during the event). In this article, we attempt to reconcile these two bodies of research. In a new model of early individuation, we propose that two systems help infants individuate objects in physical events: the object-file and physical-reasoning systems. Under certain conditions, disagreements between the systems result in catastrophic individuation failures, leading infants to hold no expectation at all about how many objects are present. We report experiments with 9- to 11-month-old infants (N = 216) that tested predictions from the model. After two objects emerged in alternation from behind a screen, infants detected no violation when the screen was lowered to reveal no object. Similarly, after two objects emerged in alternation from inside a box, which was then shaken, infants detected no violation when the box remained silent, as though empty. We end with new directions, suggested by our model, for research on early object representations.",
keywords = "Infant cognition, Object individuation, Object-file system, Physical-reasoning system",
author = "Maayan Stavans and Yi Lin and Di Wu and Baillargeon, {Renee L}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rev0000136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "196--225",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy

T2 - A new model and predictions

AU - Stavans, Maayan

AU - Lin, Yi

AU - Wu, Di

AU - Baillargeon, Renee L

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Comparison of infant findings from the physical-reasoning and object-individuation literatures reveals a contradictory picture. On the one hand, physical-reasoning results indicate that young infants can use featural information to guide their actions on objects and to detect interaction violations (when objects interact in ways that are not physically possible) as well as change violations (when objects spontaneously undergo featural changes that are not physically possible). On the other hand, object-individuation results indicate that young infants typically cannot use featural information to detect individuation violations (when the number of objects revealed at the end of an event is less than the number of objects introduced during the event). In this article, we attempt to reconcile these two bodies of research. In a new model of early individuation, we propose that two systems help infants individuate objects in physical events: the object-file and physical-reasoning systems. Under certain conditions, disagreements between the systems result in catastrophic individuation failures, leading infants to hold no expectation at all about how many objects are present. We report experiments with 9- to 11-month-old infants (N = 216) that tested predictions from the model. After two objects emerged in alternation from behind a screen, infants detected no violation when the screen was lowered to reveal no object. Similarly, after two objects emerged in alternation from inside a box, which was then shaken, infants detected no violation when the box remained silent, as though empty. We end with new directions, suggested by our model, for research on early object representations.

AB - Comparison of infant findings from the physical-reasoning and object-individuation literatures reveals a contradictory picture. On the one hand, physical-reasoning results indicate that young infants can use featural information to guide their actions on objects and to detect interaction violations (when objects interact in ways that are not physically possible) as well as change violations (when objects spontaneously undergo featural changes that are not physically possible). On the other hand, object-individuation results indicate that young infants typically cannot use featural information to detect individuation violations (when the number of objects revealed at the end of an event is less than the number of objects introduced during the event). In this article, we attempt to reconcile these two bodies of research. In a new model of early individuation, we propose that two systems help infants individuate objects in physical events: the object-file and physical-reasoning systems. Under certain conditions, disagreements between the systems result in catastrophic individuation failures, leading infants to hold no expectation at all about how many objects are present. We report experiments with 9- to 11-month-old infants (N = 216) that tested predictions from the model. After two objects emerged in alternation from behind a screen, infants detected no violation when the screen was lowered to reveal no object. Similarly, after two objects emerged in alternation from inside a box, which was then shaken, infants detected no violation when the box remained silent, as though empty. We end with new directions, suggested by our model, for research on early object representations.

KW - Infant cognition

KW - Object individuation

KW - Object-file system

KW - Physical-reasoning system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058415451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058415451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rev0000136

DO - 10.1037/rev0000136

M3 - Review article

VL - 126

SP - 196

EP - 225

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 2

ER -