Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Dialysis: Outcome and Patients' Views

Fadi Hijazi, Jean L. Holley

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initially described as an intervention to be used in otherwise healthy individuals suffering acute cardiorespiratory arrest. Over the years, CPR has been extended to all hospitalized patients unless specific orders not to resuscitate have been written with the informed consent of the patient and/or surrogate. The 14-15% survival to hospital discharge reported for in-hospital CPR has not changed over the past three decades. Compared with other diseases, chronic kidney disease reduces long-term survival (more than 6 months) following CPR, and the functional status of the few who survive is often quite poor. Nevertheless, most dialysis patients want to be resuscitated. Unfortunately television shows portraying resuscitation imply that survival after CPR is much more common than it really is. Such misinformation contributes to the overwhelming choice for CPR despite the dismal prognosis. Dialysis unit staff need to educate patients and families about the expected success and complications of CPR as part of the advance care planning process that should now be routine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-53
Number of pages3
JournalSeminars in Dialysis
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology


Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Dialysis: Outcome and Patients' Views'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this